Considering our president is a convicted rapist, I don't think sexual harassment is a career killer anymore, unfortunately.
Harris-Walz / Dems
- Thread starter Teufel
- Start date
With some voters, it's clearly not, but it really IS with a lot of folks who lean more to the left.
And I'm not disagreeing. The problem is, now that he's out of the running, he's not news anymore for most people. The left won't bring it up because they don't want that kind of heat, and the right won't bother because they're too busy trying to demonize Mamdani.
The thing with politics is there’s never going to be a definitive conclusion.
If Mamdani loses, some people will say he was too progressive while others will say his ethnicity hurt him. Others might say that with two other “nominal” Democrats on the ballot (Adam’s and Cuomo) they bled support from each other and he would’ve won if he were the only Democrat, etc
If Mamdani loses, some people will say he was too progressive while others will say his ethnicity hurt him. Others might say that with two other “nominal” Democrats on the ballot (Adam’s and Cuomo) they bled support from each other and he would’ve won if he were the only Democrat, etc
The risk is in thinking that voters want left wing extremism, when they really just want (more moderate?) left wingers who won't abuse people.
I want to make sure we actually win elections, first and foremost. If we push politicians that would do what we want, but they can't get elected, it does us no good.
Creating the conditions for the population of new york city to be able to afford to continue living in new york city... is extreme?
In the US? Anything that doesn't involve funneling more money up to the rich is extreme radical leftism.
No one running in any serious capacity. Anywhere in the US is even *close* to approaching “left wing extremism”
AOC, Bernie, Mamdani, etc would barely be center left in a civilized Country.
left wing policies of course having majority support among BOTH Democrats and Republicans. So long as you don’t describe them as left wing policies. You ask 10 random people if they think working 40 hours a week should pay you enough to live or if Healthcare or Homes should be affordable and you’re going to get 6-7 people agreeing with you.
I'm very much interested in your definition of left wing extremism. What positions do you think are so extreme that they deserve that title?
Advocating for universal healthcare and a minimum wage are left-wing extremism in the States, aren’t they?
(I don’t mean that facetiously. It seems like the idea of a basic welfare state is extreme over there.)
(And yes I don’t like actual left-wing extremists, like Trots, etc. They can be as bad as the Trump lot when it comes to thuggishness and inability to engage with anyone slightly ideologically different.)
(I don’t mean that facetiously. It seems like the idea of a basic welfare state is extreme over there.)
(And yes I don’t like actual left-wing extremists, like Trots, etc. They can be as bad as the Trump lot when it comes to thuggishness and inability to engage with anyone slightly ideologically different.)
Right wing media has been portraying it as such for like 30 years and unfortunately Fox News and its more unhinged brethren are insanely popular here.... We wouldn't be in this state if Reagan hadn't killed the fairness doctrine back in the 80s.
No, but the echo chambers wouldn't be quite so loud or prevalent if corporate media was actually required to tell the truth. Which is an INSANE statement to make, really.
Social media is part of the problem, but the issue started before social media became dominant. The term Moral Majority started being used in the 1970s and rose to prominence in the 1990s. Social media isn't the underlying cause, it just helped accelerate things.