Considering our president is a convicted rapist, I don't think sexual harassment is a career killer anymore, unfortunately.
With some voters, it's clearly not, but it really IS with a lot of folks who lean more to the left.Considering our president is a convicted rapist, I don't think sexual harassment is a career killer anymore, unfortunately.
The risk is in thinking that voters want left wing extremism, when they really just want (more moderate?) left wingers who won't abuse people.I say let the narrative that people genuinely want what Mamdani is selling play out to its logical conclusion. What's the risk, that voters will just suddenly forget why they don't want to vote for Cuomo and do it anyway?
The risk is in thinking that voters want left wing extremism, when they really just want (more moderate?) left wingers who won't abuse people.
I want to make sure we actually win elections, first and foremost. If we push politicians that would do what we want, but they can't get elected, it does us no good.
I'm very much interested in your definition of left wing extremism. What positions do you think are so extreme that they deserve that title?The risk is in thinking that voters want left wing extremism, when they really just want (more moderate?) left wingers who won't abuse people.
I want to make sure we actually win elections, first and foremost. If we push politicians that would do what we want, but they can't get elected, it does us no good.
Social media is part of the problem, but the issue started before social media became dominant. The term Moral Majority started being used in the 1970s and rose to prominence in the 1990s. Social media isn't the underlying cause, it just helped accelerate things.Social media allowing idiots to (wrongly) think they’re the majority and encase themselves in echo chambers is the real problem and not something the fairness doctrine would fix.