Defending the writing of the kids in Armada etc is like defending, say, heels (bad guys) in wrestling.
"Of course you don't like them, they're the bad guys, we're meant to hate them" only goes so far, as booing/disliking them can come from a character/narrative place (as it should), or just "this guy is boring/a terrible performer/unconvincing and I want to see someone else". Here it's not so much that the kids are "too real", it's that such behavior doesn't make for an egaging and entertaining viewing experience.
Yeah, kids in real life can be a pill. That doesn't mean they're enjoyable to watch in recurring roles in fiction when written that way, and it's far from useful as a blanket defense of such writing.
"Of course you don't like them, they're the bad guys, we're meant to hate them" only goes so far, as booing/disliking them can come from a character/narrative place (as it should), or just "this guy is boring/a terrible performer/unconvincing and I want to see someone else". Here it's not so much that the kids are "too real", it's that such behavior doesn't make for an egaging and entertaining viewing experience.
Yeah, kids in real life can be a pill. That doesn't mean they're enjoyable to watch in recurring roles in fiction when written that way, and it's far from useful as a blanket defense of such writing.