AI don't trust techbros

abates

unfortunate shark issues
Citizen
It's all very simple.
sisters.jpg
 

NovaSaber

Well-known member
Citizen
How the hell is X's context bot, which was trained on Twitter data of all things, consistently better at fact checking than Google is at fact finding?
Because Google's training data is probably the entire (search-engine-accesible part of) the internet, or at least a portion of it that includes the Onion, conspiracy sites, and Reddit shitposters named "fucksmith".


GoogleAI.png
 

Paladin

Well-known member
Citizen
someone needs to bite the bullet & use an AI generator to write a Harry Potter story about how awesome trans people are.
then Rowling & her lawyers will burn the technology from the face of the Earth out of spite.
 

Pocket

jumbled pile of person
Citizen
Because Google's training data is probably the entire (search-engine-accesible part of) the internet, or at least a portion of it that includes the Onion, conspiracy sites, and Reddit shitposters named "fucksmith".
I think you underestimate how much of Twitter is shitposting, conspiracy theories, and people who think they're the Onion. (I mean, hell, the sheer volume of disinformation on there is the whole reason the fact-check bot exists.)
 

Ungnome

Grand Empress of the Empire of One Square Foot.
Citizen
It's a shame the AI part has outpaced the robotics part, for sure. Automation COULD bring us a Star Trek utopia, but there's no monetary profit in that, so...
 

wonko the sane?

You may test that assumption at your convinience.
Citizen
The first thing a non-skynet AI work force does is completely crash the economy. Robots don't need money or luxury goods or food: but they'll have all the jobs. The rest of us need food, clothes, housing and such: and will have no money. The rich don't spend their own money, so once peoples savings dry up: the economy craps out because there won't be any money to spend on the crap the robots are making.
 


Top Bottom