I don’t really care how or if it’s explained. All I know is that it’s distracting. It’s like seeing the same actor play different characters in the same movie and not in the Mike Myers or Eddy Murphy way.
I was out on Aligned very early on for that reason. WfC the game was clearly trying to be a 2010s "mature" prequel to G1, but it got shoehorned into Aligned. And then the comic adaptation of the game got some details wrong. And then the book Exodus told an entirely distinct version of that story that was irreconcilable.Then I started seeing how they were approaching it...
Same. And being the JG1 fan I am, it pissed me off when Aligned's terminology made its way into the official subs of the JG1 shows that came out during Aligned's heyday.immediately lost me with "everything small or a partner or whatever is a Mini-Con now", and never recovered from there.
I think a lot of it is a loss of what to do, exactly. The old model of a huge blitz behind a new tv show doesn't work because cable is less and less common and streaming is so fractured. Where do you put a new show? They had the WfC trilogy on Netflix, but Netflix just up and said no to a Legacy show, despite Hasbro getting decently far into development on one. "I donno just put it on YouTube?" seems to be the play and I guess we'll see how that works with Cyberworld.To be fair, this is a necessary corporate move in this day and age, but I wish they weren't so... CONTENT with it. I mean, it's not like some good material hasn't come out of it, but I do miss the more unpredictable things that could happen.
True enough, but Masterforce was thirty-seven years ago. It wasn't the most elegant solution, or even the preferable solution, but at this point it is what it is. Ginrai is his own thing, and he looks like Optimus. You're not putting that toothpaste back in the tube nearly forty years later.I don’t really care how or if it’s explained. All I know is that it’s distracting. It’s like seeing the same actor play different characters in the same movie and not in the Mike Myers or Eddy Murphy way.
I've spoken before about my surprisingly deep fondness for RID2015 and Transformers Adventure (and a little bit of Arms Micron), akin to my fondness for the Unicron Trilogy (except this time the show wasn't riddled with issues).And then the Prime show came along, and while the show certainly did try I felt it was just... sauceless. Which is how I felt when I read the CoP. The story and the art was... ok... just bland.
And that's how I view Aligned. Bland and directionless. The most interesting part of it seems to be Rescue Bots, and that wasn't even planned on being part of it.
The WFC comic one-shot was a near-direct adaptation of Chapters 12-15 of Exodus, trimming down some of the fat in those book chapters. The part of Exodus that the game corresponds to are the book's second half.And then the comic adaptation of the game got some details wrong. And then the book Exodus told an entirely distinct version of that story that was irreconcilable.
Funny thing about those beeps and boops is that they were placed over actual recorded dialogue for Bee that was spoken by, of all people, Frank Welker.(Let's not discuss Bumblebee, who may have the worst execution of Radio Voice here ever.)
I thought they said "rightfully huge" in reference to the Thirteen themselves (meaning they thought it appropriate for the original Transformers to be "impressive" instead of Just Some Prototypes/Ancestors like the first Transformers realistically and logically should be), not the scope of Transformers: Prime (which, of course, did try very hard to be "epic")what with all the marketing hype from Hasbro about TF: Prime being "rightfully huge", "epic", and meant to run "for the next ten years!" (granted, this was all Hasbro, not the actual people making the show, who were hoping they could at least get to a third season by the end of it all).
It was used for both.I thought they said "rightfully huge" in reference to the Thirteen themselves (meaning they thought it appropriate for the original Transformers to be "impressive" instead of Just Some Prototypes/Ancestors like the first Transformers realistically and logically should be), not the scope of Transformers: Prime (which, of course, did try very hard to be "epic")
It all reminds me of attempts to reinvent English orthography so it corresponds to pronunciation with consistent rules in the way that most other languages do. Pretty quickly big compromises have to be made, the question of which accent/dialect you're ultimately favoring looms large, and the end result will be something that's far enough removed from what people are used to that it'll be an uphill battle to get them to care.Sheer feasibility alone was doomed -- how do you align ALL characters enough to write solid profiles? Even if you try to come up with a good list of core ones, there wouldn't be enough room. How do you do the same with even just the big key stories?
I mentioned earlier that one of my favorite books is The Silmarillion. When I first read it, it frequently made me go "Ohhhhh!" Reading The Covenant of Primus made me go "Oh."And then the Prime show came along, and while the show certainly did try I felt it was just... sauceless. Which is how I felt when I read the CoP. The story and the art was... ok... just bland.
Package bios! I'd called Hasbro "apathetic" when it comes to worldbuilding, but really that's about long-term cultivation. I give them all the credit in the world for the above-and-beyond investment in upfront worldbuilding they put into the brand from day one. They could've just licensed the Japanese toys and hoped they would sell on physical coolness alone. But there was a reason I would lose myself in the toy aisle poring over every TF on the shelves and not GoBots. Those giant battle scenes, the posed character portraits, the bios and tech specs, then the mail-order inserts they came with if you actually got to take one home... Everything was rich with story. And no, none of it quite lined up with the cartoon or the comic or the storybooks or anything, but every crack was a foothold for imagination.I'd love to see them just let some of the nerds on staff go to town on package bios and the like, but that's always been tricky anyway with various regions' language laws and the like.
With Welker's all-time best Megatron performance, as far as I'm concerned.Prime as a show was full of things I wanted to like. I think it's the last regular-programming run that had Peter Cullen and Frank Welker as ongoing Op/Megs?
Yeah, as I was watching it I kept thinking, this is so well-crafted, all the ingredients are top-notch... so why does it feel like less than the sum of its parts? Sunbow was a hot mess in comparison, but at least one thing you couldn't say about it was that it was lifeless.It;'s a very "clippable" show, with plenty of great sequences and great moments and lavish cinematography, but I think it's also "clippable" out of necessity -- because it's so hard to invest in sitting through the whole thing.
Hahaha, I guess that's why you don't see much Oliver Twist talk on this board.I still prefer ***erbakke over Richardson for Bulkhead,
Add to this the fact that several of the creators behind those things were also wiki editors. I don't know for sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if that were a factor in something I noticed during the heyday of "multiversal singularities" and "universal streams": Articles would make uncited claims about the nature and instances of both which I never saw questioned in all the arguments about them. Like, what it actually meant to be a singularity and who was one, and how streams corresponded to real-world media and what that meant about relationships between them, were as far as I could tell not very well attested in the fiction itself, but were stated and accepted as fact in the wiki. Even citations to creator statements were thin. I didn't have it in me to pore through edit histories to figure out who'd written what or to question the community about it. But it felt of a piece with the incestuous loop you're talking about.it quickly turned into a messy way for some fans, privileged with access (I'm sure there's a better way to say this, but anyway), to game the system and canonize their fanon for good or ill, sometimes with the excuse or justification of "it's just in this obscure side continuity of Yomama Delta 420.69, see, you can't even say what that is, ergo you have no reason to care that Shockwave is a DoorDash employee there". Between that and the Allspark Almanacs there was this whole weirdly incestual and/or masturbatory (sorry, I know this isn't the TF sex thread no one goes to) game of one-upnerdship that just drained all the fun out of it. A reference or two, I'm fine with, would even enjoy. But whole chunks of just "this is the change to this unrelated continuity I snuck into the literal margins, because this is an officially licensed publication and therefore real and if you EVER want to contradict me you'll have to get where I am" is just tacky.
The fact that the wiki basically follows this lead (and has to, I guess, since all of this is done with those canon rules in mind) diminishes the appeal of that for me too. This is one reason why it's not just this thing that happened once, this phase we went through once, that we can now let go of for peace -- this has had lasting effects on something we and official sources use as a reference and as one of our (for some) main ways of reviewing and re-experiencing the franchise. So much of it is still just there, kept alive by, again, the "how does this obscure purple alien being named Fatass affect you?" of it all.
The Sideways debacle, and the debacle about the debacle, is just one pointed example of this; I mostly viewed the discourse around that with a grimace, like why the hell did you people set up these things for each other to push back against anyway? The emperor having no clothes was definitely revealed there, and this potential fun wellspring of lore was indelibly revealed to be just this sad pissing contest.
I'm noticing myself basically saying I want to turn the world back to the '90s and freeze it. But the fact is, TF is a brand that runs on narrative media and has an audience that includes a loyal fanbase that lives for lore. Of course HasTak want to capitalize on that. Pumping out new, unrelated series works too, but that's more for another part of the audience. If somebody died and made me King Hasbro, how would I make product that appeals to the lore-hound contingent without creating some variation on the kind of thing I've been complaining about?I think a lot of it is a loss of what to do, exactly.To be fair, this is a necessary corporate move in this day and age, but I wish they weren't so... CONTENT with it. I mean, it's not like some good material hasn't come out of it, but I do miss the more unpredictable things that could happen.
Prime was like the Star Wars Prequels or the Snyder DC movies. You can clip scenes and toss them up on TikTok and they look epic and awesome, but the product as a whole never knew how to make those scenes feel earned or otherwise have value.Yeah, as I was watching it I kept thinking, this is so well-crafted, all the ingredients are top-notch... so why does it feel like less than the sum of its parts? Sunbow was a hot mess in comparison, but at least one thing you couldn't say about it was that it was lifeless.
It was during the late 2000s that brands realized that they could come off as more personable by using less formal language in promos and marketing and maybe even getting in on the sass in social media spaces. Combine that with the post-ironic age of shrugging stuff that aged poorly as a joke... and I have no idea if "rightfully huge" was supposed to be a "hip and with it" way to promote what they were trying to do, a joke, or the former that turned into the latter when the show and line petered out. Still, Hasbro had big plans for Prime as a property and Aligned as a continuity, both of which never ended up manifesting."Rightfully huge" was essentially a meme and bringing it up as an example of Marketing Gone Mad is making me feel like I'm going insane.
I've been feeling that way about the 90s myself, and I'm struggling to figure out if I'm just becoming an Old Person and defaulting to "things were better in my day," or if there really has been a noticeable shift that's not entirely been for the better over the last thirty years or so.I'm noticing myself basically saying I want to turn the world back to the '90s and freeze it. But the fact is, TF is a brand that runs on narrative media and has an audience that includes a loyal fanbase that lives for lore. Of course HasTak want to capitalize on that. Pumping out new, unrelated series works too, but that's more for another part of the audience. If I were Joe Hasbro, how would I make product that appeals to the lore-hound contingent without creating some variation on the kind of thing I've been complaining about?
Beast Wars' first episode had a very awkward "everyone names themselves" scene. "Optimus Primal" was just a part of that.With regard to the Ginrai topic, how do we feel about Optimus Primal having Optimus Prime's name and face as a result of his toy being designed to be Prime, and that being an in-universe coincidence rarely, if ever, acknowledged by the characters? Is that also an absurd concept for a sequel and a ridiculous thing to ask audiences to accept, or does he get a pass for some reason?
What really brought this home was when he reverted to being Orion Pax. Cullen's delivery had life again. I was hopeful that this would be a new status quo, that Pax would need to grow naturally back into being Prime over the course of the show. Alas.Prime himself was a big part of this. I don't blame Cullen, because I never found his voice to be the issue. No, the issue was that the writers of that show fell into the trap of thinking 1986 movie Optimus WAS G1 Optimus, and they went from there. Their mandates that Optimus wouldn't use contractions and "Primes don't party" turned Optimus into a boring trailer line machine.
To be fair, I think Cullen's age is not not a factor. I watch Sunbow and I just can't imagine him bringing all the same energy today. I hear the difference between a younger guy impersonating his older brother and an actual old man.Compare this with G1 S1 and S2 Optimus who played basketball, trash talked Megatron, called Astrotrain and Blitzwing "boobies," and lost his temper when Grapple and Hoist made friends with the Constructicons or Blaster played his music too loud.
Very true. I tried to give Prime as much slack as I could, knowing its technical limitations. But the comparison to BW, even after over a decade of CGI advancement, shows it up. When I imagine "BW background", the first thing I see is waving palm fronds. When I imagine "Prime background", it's a still desert.The CGI medium didn't help. Everything felt so empty. Be it the DBZ-style desert wastelands a lot of the action took place in, or the town of Jasper, everything felt empty.
Beast Wars also had this issue, but the prehistoric setting meant it was far less obvious, and the jungle setting meant that backgrounds at least FELT lively, even if they didn't have many assets in them. Prime, by contrast, had an empty feeling small town or an empty desert as its setting for most of the show. Even when they ventured out of that, it was to the empty Arctic, or an empty greyscale forest.
Both can be true. I'm pretty sure if I were actually teleported back to the '90s, I would struggle to readjust to a world of dial-up and dumb-phones (or really still land-lines). And I've certainly had experiences of rewatching beloved media from that time and going, huh, this was actually pretty crappy. We tend to remember the better things and forget the worse ones.I've been feeling that way about the 90s myself, and I'm struggling to figure out if I'm just becoming an Old Person and defaulting to "things were better in my day," or if there really has been a noticeable shift that's not entirely been for the better over the last thirty years or so.
I think it speaks to wider problems with technological progress that we are always looking to improve the technology in our lives, but at a certain point it stops being incremental improvements and becomes entire system changing, or system destroying, leaps.
I can't answer for a "we", but for myself, I think it's dumb and confusing, but to the extent that it's earned a pass, it's because the character and storytelling outshined it. If BW weren't so damn good, I think that would be a criticism you'd hear more.With regard to the Ginrai topic, how do we feel about Optimus Primal having Optimus Prime's name and face as a result of his toy being designed to be Prime, and that being an in-universe coincidence rarely, if ever, acknowledged by the characters? Is that also an absurd concept for a sequel and a ridiculous thing to ask audiences to accept, or does he get a pass for some reason?
I mean, Botcon 2010 was a convention with people in attendance, so maybe you could ask whether anyone here was at the panel where the phrase came up, and remembers what the was context and what the vibes were.It was during the late 2000s that brands realized that they could come off as more personable by using less formal language in promos and marketing and maybe even getting in on the sass in social media spaces. Combine that with the post-ironic age of shrugging stuff that aged poorly as a joke... and I have no idea if "rightfully huge" was supposed to be a "hip and with it" way to promote what they were trying to do, a joke, or the former that turned into the latter when the show and line petered out. Still, Hasbro had big plans for Prime as a property and Aligned as a continuity, both of which never ended up manifesting.
Until we found out that he, Megatron, and Tarantulas each still had those names back on Cybertron.Beast Wars' first episode had a very awkward "everyone names themselves" scene. "Optimus Primal" was just a part of that.
I'm sure it was said jokingly... but I also doubt anyone was going to say "yeah our new show is going to be epic *dismissive jerking motion* "I mean, Botcon 2010 was a convention with people in attendance, so maybe you could ask whether anyone here was at the panel where the phrase came up, and remembers what the was context and what the vibes were.
With regard to the Ginrai topic, how do we feel about Optimus Primal having Optimus Prime's name and face as a result of his toy being designed to be Prime, and that being an in-universe coincidence rarely, if ever, acknowledged by the characters? Is that also an absurd concept for a sequel and a ridiculous thing to ask audiences to accept, or does he get a pass for some reason?