Well, we will see in another ten years or so what happens, if we are still alive and not being forced to work in mines for the AI overlords.And I disagree with this. Sorry.
Well, we will see in another ten years or so what happens, if we are still alive and not being forced to work in mines for the AI overlords.And I disagree with this. Sorry.
Please don't take offense, but I don't know what to say after reading that because you are literally saying that Last Jedi is up there with A New Hope and Empire Strikes Back .
I can't see how someone would say the ST is a set of worse movies than the PT or how someone wouldn't rank AotC at the very bottom without trying to troll people online.but I just literally cannot see why someone would say that without trying to troll people online.
Speaking of subjective opinions... I found Clone Wars massively overwrought, bloated, and near impossible to get into. People say it "fixes" PT Anakin, but if you need seven seasons of tv to fix PT Anakin then maybe PT Anakin just kinda sucks?I feel like it should be noted that the Prequels also have the benefit of almost 18 years of tie-in media to smooth them over and solidify links to the OT (and even to the Sequels themselves, through Dr. McMumbles and Project Necromancer).
I can't see how someone would say the ST is a set of worse movies than the PT or how someone wouldn't rank AotC at the very bottom without trying to troll people online.
Perfectly reasonable. I know that we all don't see eye to eye here, and I take no offense by you two having different opinions on this. To be honest, it is just neat to discuss it though.But that's the thing, if we assume we're all coming at this in good faith- and given that we've curated a pretty good community here I think we can say we are- it's best to just admit that this is all incredibly subjective and we're coming at this with different tastes. At that point "I agree to disagree" is a perfectly reasonable position to take.
Speaking of subjective opinions... I found Clone Wars massively overwrought, bloated, and near impossible to get into. People say it "fixes" PT Anakin, but if you need seven seasons of tv to fix PT Anakin then maybe PT Anakin just kinda sucks?
I keep hearing Shadow Lord is good and Ahsoka is one of the better Disney+ Star Wars shows, but I just don't care.
I was digging Rebels until Ahsoka showed up, because it was committed to its own story until getting hijacked by Dave Filoni's OC.
Incidentally, I found Tales of the Jedi to be great when it was exploring Dooku's gradual disillusionment with the Republic and the Jedi Order, but fell flat when it started trying to cover every second of Ahsoka's life.
I suppose I'd have a better appreciation for Ahsoka as a character if I actually got into Clone Wars, but again I tried and the show seemed too bloated for me to really get invested.
My biggest issue is that she's a very power Jedi-trained Force user who just vanishes once we get to ANH. All of Obi Wan and Yoda's pathos about pinning the hopes of the Jedi on Luke is undone because now you're wondering where Ahsoka is.
She really is the sort of character that needed to die at the end of Clone Wars but alas...
That's part of my issue with the PT, it's very poorly paced for the story it wants to tell. I know "rewriting the Prequels" is tired territory so I won't get too into it but...I wouldn't say it fixies Anakin, it just lets his character develop more over time so that his actions in Episode 3 aren't just out of nowhere. You get to spend a lot more time with him and the clones.
I've seen all of those shows and I actually dig them all. I question the need for Leia to be in the Obi Wan show, because I think it would have been stronger if it was about Ben and Luke forming a bond (they seem to know each other and be on friendly terms at the start of ANH), but the show did enough good that I still liked it. I also think it's kind of funny how by adding another Anakin vs Obi Wan fight into the timeline, Anakin is now a pretty sold 2-1 over Anakin. Which makes his decision to just give up and let Vader strike him down in ANH pretty amusing. "Oh I guess I'll let the poor sap have this one."I would highly recommend that you watch Andor if you haven't seen it yet. Also, the Mandalorian is a great show too. A lot of folks didn't like the Obiqwan series but I did, so you will probably hate it.![]()
Oh no doubt I would. Still... it's a bit bothersome ya know? Like... so much about the plot of the OT is that the Jedi are functionally extinct. It's just Obi Wan and Yoda and they're both old as dirt. Vader is one too, but he's thrown in with Team Evil, so it falls on Obi Wan and Yoda to try and train Luke. He is the last Jedi, with maybe Leia as a backup.And if you have finished Rebels, then you would know why.
I'm sure the ending of Rebels gives an explanation, but I don't feel like it would be air tight enough to alleviate this issue.
I've seen all of those shows and I actually dig them all. I question the need for Leia to be in the Obi Wan show, because I think it would have been stronger if it was about Ben and Luke forming a bond (they seem to know each other and be on friendly terms at the start of ANH), but the show did enough good that I still liked it. I also think it's kind of funny how by adding another Anakin vs Obi Wan fight into the timeline, Anakin is now a pretty sold 2-1 over Anakin. Which makes his decision to just give up and let Vader strike him down in ANH pretty amusing. "Oh I guess I'll let the poor sap have this one."
My only real complaint with the shows you listed is that while Andor might be one of the best pieces of Star Wars media ever produced, I wish some of its more zealous fans would stop insisting everything in Star Wars be like Andor.
Another show I liked was Skeleton Crew and it's basically Goonies in space. Star Wars should be the franchise where you can tell an 80s kids adventure movie story, or a space western, or deep look into evils of authoritarianism and the struggle to resist. Everything should be viable, and I find it a shame that some fans want Star Wars to be so limited in the stories it can tell.
There have been so many secret survivors of Order 66 revealed over the years that Obi Wan's statement that Vader helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the Jedi seems like a bold faced lie, but Ahsoka seems like the most egregious example because she's so central to the narrative both before and after the OT. This is a powerful Force user trained as a Jedi who Obi Wan and Yoda both know well, and she's never even mentioned in the OT? She never pops in? She never even shows up to help with Luke's training?
I'm sure the ending of Rebels gives an explanation, but I don't feel like it would be air tight enough to alleviate this issue.
If the Clone Wars break out and a young Obi Wan is forced onto Tatooine for whatever reason he can meet a teenage Anakin. He finds he's very strong in the Force, and they bond with Obi Wan encouraging him to hone his gifts. Maybe the Separatists are making life difficult on Tatooine, and this inspires Anakin to follow Obi Wan both to train as a Jedi and because Obi Wan is fighting against the people who are harassing his home.
This setup gives you an entire trilogy to explore the Clone Wars. Still less time then seven seasons of tv, but you could introduce Rex and Cody and some of the other Clones of note as significant side character in Ep I and you could follow them and Anakin and Obi Wan as they grow through this war through the three movies.
As-is, Ep I feels strangely disconnected. Sure, there are through lines. Palpatine is both behind the Trade Federation blockade and invasion of Naboo and he's behind the outbreak of the Clone Wars. And you even have the Trade Federation involved in both... but even then, ten years pass between Ep I and Ep II. The events of TPM are only tangentially related to the events of Ep II and Ep III. An entire decade of Anakin and Obi Wan's friendship is just glossed over because Lucas insisted on starting Ep I with a 9 year old Anakin. Additionally this choice means that the Clone Wars starts at the very end of Ep II and concludes at the end of Ep III. We only really get one movie to explore the very conflict that sets the stage for the Empire's rise.
Again, by reworking the PT so that Ep I is about the Clone Wars' outbreak, you give yourself much more time to tell that story and flesh out everyone's role in it.
I think it could have been, and should have been, both. The Clone Wars provide the perfect backdrop for Anakin's story to unfold.The thing is the PT isn't about the Clone Wars. The PT is about the Shakespearean tragedy of Anakin Skywalker.
This is true, but it gets back to my problems with the trilogy. A lot of this is told, not shown. Anakin is formally inducted into the Jedi Order at the end of Ep I at the age of 9. We don't see him again until he's 19. That's a decade worth of character growth and potential insights into his growing frustration with the Jedi Order we don't see, and are only told about. The difference between 9 and 19 might as well be the difference between 5 and 100. Anakin is functionally an entirely different character when we meet him at the start of Ep II compared to the boy we met and got to know in Ep I.Complaints that Anakin flips too quickly in ROTS are missing the thread. The jedi thing didn't abruptly stop working. It was never working. It was never going to work. It was never the job he thought he signed up for and was never going to be.
That's the problem, though. Objectively speaking, Anakin gave the Jedi plenty of time to "work" for him, and it never clicked.... but that isn't successfully conveyed narratively. We meet up with Obi Wan and Anakin at the start of Ep II, and ten years have past since we left them. We get some banter that alludes to adventures they've had that we didn't see, and we later get scenes of Obi Wan scolding Anakin like a frustrated teacher, and the heavy implication that these kinda talks are regular occurances... but because this is conveyed passively after the fact it doesn't hit as hard.That's why the ten year timeskip matters. We can't say he didn't give the jedi thing a fair try. And people still say he flipped too quickly.
I think it could have been, and should have been, both. The Clone Wars provide the perfect backdrop for Anakin's story to unfold.
And I agree that George was going for something Shakespearean with Anakin's fall, I just don't think he accomplished it particularly well. It's kind of like how Prime aspired to epic storytelling, but ultimately that amounted to vibes and mood more than substance. The pieces in the PT for Akanin's grand Shakespearean tragedy are there, but they aren't assembled or performed in a satisfying way. And I do blame Lucas for that. It wasn't just his script, it was his direction. Natalie Portman won an Oscar, I can't blame her for Padme coming off like a cardboard cutout.
I can see George wanting to go for that stars-crossed lovers/Shakespearean tragedy angle to their relationship. He's trying. The dialogue so badly wants to be that, but it's just not there. And if it's not that, it's his static shot/reverse shot direction with actors against sets that are mostly green screens filled in with PS3-level CGI environments. The problems just compound.
I respect the vision, I see what he's going for, but too many shortfalls are happening to make it work, IMO.
This is true, but it gets back to my problems with the trilogy. A lot of this is told, not shown. Anakin is formally inducted into the Jedi Order at the end of Ep I at the age of 9. We don't see him again until he's 19. That's a decade worth of character growth and potential insights into his growing frustration with the Jedi Order we don't see, and are only told about. The difference between 9 and 19 might as well be the difference between 5 and 100. Anakin is functionally an entirely different character when we meet him at the start of Ep II compared to the boy we met and got to know in Ep I.
If we have Obi Wan take Anakin under his wing as a 13-14 year old instead in Ep I, we can explore more of his development over the three movies and see his growing disillusionment with the Jedi and Republic and how that leads to him willing to embrace Palpatine and the Dark Side.
Different character, different kind of tragedy, but Dooku does deserve all the fans.One of the best things Disney+ Star Wars has put out was the Dooku half of Tales of the Jedi. Seeing his slow, growing disullusionment with the Republic and Jedi was perfect... and I feel like there could have been a chance to do that with Anakin in the PT, if George didn't insist on a timeline that saw a full ten year time jump.
Those offscreen adventures weren't important though. Anakin had one irreconcilable frustration, but that never budged in either direction. He otherwise spent those ten years being a mostly normal jedi not doing anything that really mattered. The early events of AOTC break the ten year stalemate by bringing that one thing to the surface.That's the problem, though. Objectively speaking, Anakin gave the Jedi plenty of time to "work" for him, and it never clicked.... but that isn't successfully conveyed narratively. We meet up with Obi Wan and Anakin at the start of Ep II, and ten years have past since we left them. We get some banter that alludes to adventures they've had that we didn't see, and we later get scenes of Obi Wan scolding Anakin like a frustrated teacher, and the heavy implication that these kinda talks are regular occurances... but because this is conveyed passively after the fact it doesn't hit as hard.
... I could bring up a lot of dialog in AOTC that tends to get overlooked but that's still the 'show, don't tell' problem, yeah. The story is there but it is a talky one.You're right, objectively Anakin didn't turn too quickly in the PT, but it feels like he did because so much of Anakin's formative dissillusionment is left as vague backstory, if it's even mentioned at all. We need to see Anakin wanting to do the right thing, bringing that idealistic vision of the Jedi he has into the order, and seeing how his idealism collides with the realities of how the Order operates. All of that does happen, but we don't see most of it. I'm just saying if we saw more of it, it would help the story that's being told come into its own better.
"'sup.""We need to talk. I'm the Phantom of the Opera and you claim to be the Phantom Menace."
"Well which one of us was using 'Phantom' first?"
![]()
"I started using it in 1875, with the opening of the Opéra Garnier. And you?"
![]()
"A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away."
![]()
"...is that before or after mine?"
![]()
"I... don't know."
![]()