Search results

Also this would ban cloud seeding, which I assume is legitimately useful.

We wondered what it would take to get the right to splinter... And we're going to keep wondering, because Elon is the most unpopular person on earth right now. Trump's fans all hate him, and he's too extreme to be liked by anyone else. Who's he think he's even going to find to run under this...

I nearly clicked off when I caught them talking up Bitcoin as something that might hypothetically have had some good reason to exist at some point, but I trudged through anyway and got to this part: Hey, isn't this pretty much exactly what I said a few months ago?

I think we all need to keep in mind that we're still discussing an election for mayor of New York City. At least for the immediate term, his position on nationalized health insurance or the war in Iran are far less relevant to the electorate than, say, his position on plastic straws.

Anyway it's not going to matter how the media spins Mamdani's campaign because having to split the vote with two other people is what's actually going to cost him the election, and no one is going to try to deny that once it's happened.

Wait, there's TWO other liberals that are gonna be on the ballot? OK at this point I am begging you to tell me that New York City uses a ranked ballot system and I just didn't realize it otherwise this whole situation is so much dumber than I realized.

Just ask the Amish; they can build a whole barn in a single day.

I say let the narrative that people genuinely want what Mamdani is selling play out to its logical conclusion. What's the risk, that voters will just suddenly forget why they don't want to vote for Cuomo and do it anyway?

Hell, that's what forced Al Franken to resign and he was the kind of fighter that liberals have been asking for.

me, after watching that unfold on Tumblr and then Twitter: yep, right on schedule

All courts are biased. There is no such thing as being apolitical if your job is literally being part of the government. The only question is whether it's biased in favor of what's right, or what's wrong.

You can do that??? Welp, congrats in advance to whoever the hell the Republican candidate is, I guess.

You do realize that if anyone actually has an answer to that question, it may be unwise to blurt it out in a public space.

Yeah it gives me hope that someone will finally bait him into saying the N word.

Also if we're going to invest that much in transportation infrastructure, we'd be better off bringing back rail travel.

Ooh, right, impeachment proceedings would pre-empt whatever else is trying to happen, all of which is going to be the Republicans' doing. It'd be like filibustering on a meta scale. Well in that case, they should be clogging the system with one impeachment hearing after another until the next...

They didn't have the votes in the Senate to convict the last two times either. Didn't stop them. And back then they actually had a majority, so they were capable of accomplishing other things. Right now there's really nothing to do besides wait for Republicans' terrible bills to hit the floor...

I mean, she's making me want to commit a crime right now... too bad I'm on the wrong side of the ocean.

And this, right here, is why what the US is doing should not be called deportation.

Why hire someone to laugh at him if you're going to be doing it involuntarily yourself every time you read one of his posts? I'd consider it one of the perks of the job.