Search results

Hahahahahahahaha

Oops, he did it again?

It's likely, if anything, to be a gradual scaling back of Disney activities in Florida. Probably unrelated, Disney are shutting down the Star Wars Hotel that they just launched last year in Florida. I understand it had been struggling financially so it's hard to say how much influence...

Sure, why not?

Hopefully Derrick Wyatt's family can do something to make his account active so it doesn't get deleted because it's inactive because, you know, he died.

Unsurprisingly Santos is claiming witch hunt on Twitter. Just following the lead of ex-President and sexual abuser Donald Trump.

Trump's been slapped with a gag order for the criminal hush money trial against him. He can't talk or post on social media about it at all without incurring a charge of contempt: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-barred-posting-evidence-hush-money-case-social-media-rcna83444 It...

A good start.

That DeSantis guy is not very smart.

This seems like an appropriate response:

Fox Corp's value has dropped by $700 million in the wake of the firing. Nice!

She's now sent out an apology, possibly after consulting both a dictionary and a history book.

It's getting so I keep thinking we should change the thread title to "What evil thing did the GOP say or do this time?"

It turns out that they couldn't work out a way to mass unverify people who had legacy blue ticks, so instead they just hid the blue ticks on the front end:

Twitter wasn't selling the NFTs themselves, it was just a way to display existing NFTs as your Twitter avatar. The hexagonal avatars still exist, though they're of limited use to tell who to avoid, because they require having twitter blue, which is a more universal indicator of who to avoid.

I'm nostalgic for two years ago when the NRA was declaring bankruptcy. Did they hold a go fund me or something?

Turns out Trump was actively hiding documents in Mar-A-Lago, personally moving them after getting the subpoena:

It could be that they had a spreadsheet they maintained with additional information that you wouldn't have in a database table. Stuff like why they were verified in the first place, possibly some contact details, notes, etc. In any case, they've solved the problem by making the message...

Absolutely cracking work!

It seems to have a time limit built in, from what I read. In section 3: Maybe I'm interpreting it wrong, but it looks like they've limited it so it would only apply to whatever the secretary of commerce could review in the 180 days.