Thus, we got ROTB with its diet flavor of Bayhem.
I love that phrase!
Thus, we got ROTB with its diet flavor of Bayhem.
Even if these movies were to have the Joes in them instead of just the Army, Sector Seven, NEST, or the TRF, the movies would still put the main focus on everyman-type civilians like Sam, Cade, Charlie, and Noah because those are the kinds of protagonists who casual mass audiences find the most relatable. The kind of characters that executives believe everyone can see themselves in and put themselves in their shoes. Because, from the narrow perspective of these filmmakers, the robots and soldiers are perceived as being too larger-than-life to be relatable for audiences who live lives far too mundane by comparison for them to be able to relate to either the highly-trained special mission force or the literal godlike titans walking among mere men.
This perception could have been changed for the better if the smaller scaled Bumblebee movie--with its titular character being both very prominent and very relatable--had been a significantly greater success, but it wasn't. Thus, we got ROTB with its diet flavor of Bayhem.
Hence why these executives are so out of touch with their audiences.I have never met someone who didn't find the TF07 soldiers the most likable characters in the movie.
If you just change the names, then no the film doesn’t get magically better. You have to take away focus from the while Sam, parents, and Megan fox. Give focus to the kids, and show off some of their abilities and vehicles.Transformers came out in 2007. Which is notable because the MCU would kick off the very next year with Iron Man.
Had Transformers come out just a few years later after Hollywood realized the money to be made in interconnected brand universes, it's entirely possible the movie is pretty much exactly the same only Lennox was named "Duke" and Epps was named "Roadblock."
Now the question is... how much does your enjoyment of the 2007 movie change if literally everything else is the same, it's just that the human military characters have GI Joe names?
I admit I would find it neat, but I'm a dork posting on a Transformers message board. I'd wager to the vast majority of people they wouldn't care.
Just as Spielberg wanted.nonverbal forces of nature
Of all of RotB's problems, Noah and Mirage wasn't one of them. That was pretty well done, imo. One of the issues, however, relates to the second point. The movie has the perfectly sized robot cast at the start. Optimus, Bumblebee, Mirage, Arcee, and then Scourge and two goons as villains. That's a pretty manageable cast, when you include Noah and his bro for the human side of things.And yes, I know it bombed and every part of it is therefore toxic in all future discussions, but I genuinely feel like RotB had the best approach with Mirage and Noah; reiterate the human-partner dynamic that's been such a fixture of TF fiction from all the way back in G1, while remembering to let the TF half of the partnership actually speak (as much as I loved Bumblebee, having to align with Bay's continuity crippled it).
Then keep the surrounding TF cast small, so that they each have room to show off their own personalities by interacting with the Hero Pair.
That says more about the rest of the movie than it does about the soldiers, really.I have never met someone who didn't find the TF07 soldiers the most likable characters in the movie.
Nah, they're fun. Lennox and Epps have really good "action movie buddy duo" chemistry.That says more about the rest of the movie than it does about the soldiers, really.
Feels like that could be more attributed to Josh and Tyrese's natural charms, charisma, and acting chemistry that they themselves brought to the roles rather than anything from the writers and director.Nah, they're fun. Lennox and Epps have really good "action movie buddy duo" chemistry.
Possibly, but that's movie making. It's a collaborative effort. Everyone needs to bring something.Feels like that could be more attributed to Josh and Tyrese's natural charms, charisma, and acting chemistry that they themselves brought to the roles rather than anything from the writers and director.
And yes, I know it bombed and every part of it is therefore toxic in all future discussions, but I genuinely feel like RotB had the best approach with Mirage and Noah; reiterate the human-partner dynamic that's been such a fixture of TF fiction from all the way back in G1, while remembering to let the TF half of the partnership actually speak (as much as I loved Bumblebee, having to align with Bay's continuity crippled it).
Then keep the surrounding TF cast small, so that they each have room to show off their own personalities by interacting with the Hero Pair.
(There's also the independent question of pacing; modern movies --especially Bay-influenced Transformers movies-- are hyperactive ADHD fits made by executives on speed and Monster Energy drinks. No one gets an interesting character in that. If TF movies want to show us that these giant alien robots have personalities, they need to be unafraid to slow down and give us a few "downtime" scenes --and if there are human characters around to compare/contrast with, all the better.)
The takeaway is that these human characters are still strong elements in a Transformers movie. Part of writing is coming up with characters to populate the scenes with, and maybe most of what they say and do (idk how much of this that was memorable was from ad lib takes). Part of directing is putting people with chemistry in contexts where they can play off each other and improve the dynamic that way. And the chemistry they do have is something they bring to the table. They all have a hand in making the soldiers a worthwhile part of the plot, which they can't really do if the production just sidelines humans to focus on the bots.Feels like that could be more attributed to Josh and Tyrese's natural charms, charisma, and acting chemistry that they themselves brought to the roles rather than anything from the writers and director.