Right, I mean the Republican nomination field here in Ohio was pretty stacked. Of the two, Josh Mandel and JD Vance has the strongest marketing campaign. I didn't know whether either of them were Trump-endorsed and the spread between the two was less than 88,000 votes. Vance only got 33% of the total vote, Mandel got 23% and the rest was divided up among the remaining candidates.
I don't see this as Trump grip as much as a marketing campaign, and *as a marketer* I feel Vance's beat Mandel. I'm not saying he's the right Senate choice for Ohio, but that between the two, Vance's felt more successful.