"This op-ed from Fight for the Future, a group organizing around the internet and political power, criticizes Democrats' backing of age verification laws and attacks on Section 230 as enabling a censorious MAGA agenda...
...Top Democrats are continuing to enable Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ tech agenda in three key ways. The first is through misguided attacks on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, known as the “First Amendment” of the Internet. Section 230 specifies that online platforms like TikTok and Instagram can’t be held legally responsible for content that their users upload. It’s what prevents tech companies from being sued by billionaires and the government when people share content they don’t like. It’s why you can post on social media about a protest, or link to information on abortion and LGBTQ+ health care, and the company that owns the platform can’t be held liable and pressured to take it down. It also protects platforms from being prosecuted under discriminatory state laws that criminalize LGBTQ+ content and other “forbidden” topics and resources...
...The second way lawmakers are implementing anti-LGBTQ+ censorship is through age verification laws, which subject people to online ID checks before accessing websites that the state declares harmful to minors. One of these laws was passed in Kansas last year, where state law broadly defines “harmful to minors” to include anything depicting nonsexual “acts of homosexuality.”
Under the banner of protecting children, these laws can be used to prevent queer and trans youth from accessing information about LGBTQ+ health care and connecting with online queer communities. Age verification laws also subject LGBTQ+ people of all ages to invasive surveillance, including online government ID checks and facial recognition scans, giving state governments and the Trump administration more information they could use to attack and discriminate against queer and trans people...
...The third and final way lawmakers are advancing anti-LGBTQ+ censorship is by reintroducing KOSA, the fake online safety bill, that would establish a “duty of care” for apps and websites used by young people, requiring them to use censorship to “prevent and mitigate” harms like anxiety and depression. KOSA takes the same logic of the bans on drag shows and LGBTQ+ books and applies it to the internet, allowing censorship of a broad range of information in the name of protecting kids from real online harm.
Instead of stopping Big Tech from harming kids with surveillance and manipulative algorithms, KOSA would focus on stopping platforms from showing young people speech that the government deems harmful. And it’s being supported by Democrats, including self-styled LGBTQ+ ally Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who recently resumed publicly pushing the bill. Blumenthal co-wrote the bill with Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and has reintroduced it in Congress every year since 2022. The most recent version of the bill was co-sponsored by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and most Democrats outside the party’s progressive wing have been consistently on board since its earlier iterations..."