"This is the most beautiful planet in the galaxy! so alive! all right, fire up the feeder."
Shockwave you dastardly bar-steward!
Shockwave you dastardly bar-steward!
Oh... so, this is just going to be a thing in this series, huh?And I feel like the animal lovers in the audience will be pretty split on this issue. There's some very sweet scenes involving animals. And...some not so nice scenes. You've been warned. You can't say you haven't been now.
Ouch....No not Swerve, he's probably already dead the way this universe is going.
Yeah, I'm kind of afraid it is.Oh... so, this is just going to be a thing in this series, huh?
I'm guessing Beachcomber just stayed very, VERY still while he was stuck alone on the Moon. Maybe it's possible to survive with a "full tank" as long as you aren't doing much to use it up? I'll admit, it's a bit odd, though.So I've mentioned this before they retconned their retcon. It wasn't millions of years in the first issue...which I liked because I always thought the millions of years plot hole caused trouble with back on Cybertron stories. It seems they've gone back to it with Beachcombers story. When Spike points out Beachcomber was alone the whole time Beachcomber points out the animals, but he was still alone on the moon for millions of years...and for a series obsessed with Energon...how did he keep running...oh well .still enjoyed the issue...still mad Bumblebee is dead. Which is a shame because I feel they are writing Cliffjumper more as Bumblebee than Cliffjumper.
He doesn't seem to move at all through the flurry of "time passes" panel changes, so this seems plausible.I'm guessing Beachcomber just stayed very, VERY still while he was stuck alone on the Moon. Maybe it's possible to survive with a "full tank" as long as you aren't doing much to use it up? I'll admit, it's a bit odd, though.
I mean, DWJ literally says in the letters page that he always hated BB and preferred Cliffjumper, so he chose to immediately kill off BB and put the focus on Cliff instead.And I'm guessing part of the reason why they're using Cliffjumper instead of Bumblebee is because Hasbro might not be too keen on letting their "kid friendly character" get the kind of business he's getting right now in the comic.
I don't know. I feel like being fueled by literal buckets of blood is maybe going a *little* farther than normal?Consuming animals for energy?? In a comic book?!? The horror
Well, both could be true. Hasbro might be more protective of Bumblebee AND DWJ could just like Cliffjumper better, anyway. He can have his cake and eat it too, that way.I mean, DWJ literally says in the letters page that he always hated BB and preferred Cliffjumper, so he chose to immediately kill off BB and put the focus on Cliff instead.
Yeah, I'm kind of afraid it is.
It's serving a purpose. It's showing us the difference between the Autobots and the Decepticons. Autobots value organic life. And the Decepticons...don't, usually. But, this does get excessive, sometimes. I'm just glad Spike doesn't have a pet dog in this comic, because I'd be terrified for the little guy the entire time I'm reading this comic.
To be fair, it's SO over the top in this issue that I have a hard time being too upset about it. It's just too 90s for me to take it too seriously. I don't think it's trying to be malicious, it's just trying to be "X-TREME!".
Which is a shame because I feel they are writing Cliffjumper more as Bumblebee than Cliffjumper.
I thought it served that purpose already? Or am I remembering wrong?
www.previewsworld.com
www.previewsworld.com
www.previewsworld.com
www.previewsworld.com
The Centre will be terribly disappointed in her, though.Scarlett avoid having to punch a shark. Probably for the best. Those sharks are probably still grieving over the loss of their whale friends. Best not add injury to insult.
That what, now?that sweet Dog Man money