Anti-Semitism

KidTDragon

Now with hi-res avatar!
Citizen
Did his anti-Semitism just start appearing in the comics last year, or have there been hints of it before then?
 

Tuxedo Prime

Well-known member
Citizen
Did his anti-Semitism just start appearing in the comics last year, or have there been hints of it before then?
The comic's hard-right turn started in 2019 (apparently a side effect of 2011's radical-feminist reboot, connected by a trans-woman-phobia pipeline), but the canards and caricatures appear to have taken off more recently, per TV Tropes' capsule summary.
 

Pocket

jumbled pile of person
Citizen
So what if there's nothing wrong with him, this is just how he is?
This being just how he is and something being wrong with him aren't mutually exclusive. Some people are defective by design but that doesn't make them not defective.
 

MrBlud

Well-known member
Citizen
Didn’t have the Anti-Defamation League defending the Sieg-Heil on my Bingo card but maybe I should’ve…
IMG_5827.jpeg
 

Rhinox

too old for this
Citizen
yeah, no. I'm not willing to give grace or take a breath. ************ gave a seig heil on stage and you want us to calm down? 14 different ways y'all can kiss my speckled irish ass.
 

Thylacine 2000

Well-known member
Citizen
Coordinated brigading on Wikipedia to strip away Jewish history and perspectives and whitewash Hamas has been ongoing for months. Their arbitration committee just voted to topic-ban multiple editors, but the changes they made are still up, and the decision to forbid the ADL as a Wikipedia source - coordinated by those same editors - remains in effect.

 

Anonymous X

Well-known member
Citizen
So this man, whom most British broadcasters use as the go-to “priest with political opinions” in their news discussion programmes, throws a Nazi salute at some Christian right event over in the States. I think this is all being coordinated to ‘normalise’ Nazi semiotics.
 

KidTDragon

Now with hi-res avatar!
Citizen

Rhinox

too old for this
Citizen
Well done!
Heard something that I think fits very well with some of Elon's apologists. That his salute was done as an ironic statement or some such. "If you hug a goat ironically, you're still a goat fucker". I think the same principle can apply to the salute. You may be ******* that goat just to get a rise out of people or to curry favor, but you're still a goat fucker.
 

Anonymous X

Well-known member
Citizen

Huh. Consequences. How 'bout that?
Good. Let’s hope it ends what’s left of his broadcasting ‘career’ as a conservative talking head.
 

Rhinox

too old for this
Citizen
Good. Let’s hope it ends what’s left of his broadcasting ‘career’ as a conservative talking head.
I'm sure it won't. I can see it now.
OAN announces new Religion Commentator. The man too opinionated for the church! Bringing his direct views to you without any woke supervision!
 

Thylacine 2000

Well-known member
Citizen
Crappy Passover:


 

PrimalxConvoy

NOT a New Member.
Citizen
so glad the Senate has their priorities in order.

I'm not really up to speed with this.

IF Jesus was a real person and IF the Bible's depiction of events is basically true (for argument's sake) then isn't it ok to say SOME Jewish people killed another Jewish person (Jesus)? Isn't it like saying that some Jewish Israelis killed thousands of people in Palestine (which is easier to verify than the Christian position)?

I can understand possibly that it's anti-semetic to state "The (i.e. "All") Jews" were/are responsible for killing Jesus", right?

What am I missing here, because although I'm a Christian, I have no love for the American "politicians" behind the article above.
 

NovaSaber

Well-known member
Citizen
First, even with the framing that tries to shift a portion of the blame, the Bible still does say that it was Romans who actually killed Jesus.

And second, there is indeed a history of anti-Semitic Christians blaming "all Jews".

But also yes, blaming one specific group of long-dead Jews is the closest you can get to it that can really be defensibly called "a religious belief".
That's still indirectly anti-Semitic; it's believing complete nonsense that was seemingly put in the Bible for the purpose of scapegoating Jews to take the blame off the Roman authorities.
The idea that a Roman governor gave a Jewish crowd a choice in which condemned person to pardon is absurd.

(Honestly, the fact that the gospels blatantly try to blame the Jews, while still portraying Jesus's actual cause of death as crucifixion by the Romans, is the strongest evidence that exists for the crucifixion having even happened, because if they were making it up they'd have had him killed by the people they actually wanted to blame.)
 


Top Bottom