That's not how that answer came about, though. That "problem" was itself part of the answer, not part of the question being answered.
My point is that the alleged results of fixing this unseen crisis don't exist, and AVP's inaccurate description of the official timeline as containing them means...
He's obviously unaware of the masculine green almond mascot one there used to be, if he's fearmongering about "woke M&Ms" without suggesting that the current green one is the same "character" and therefore trans.
Even some pre-Shroud AVP answers were saying G1 cartoon Unicron wasn't part of the multiversal singularity.
(Which raises the question of how much the singularities ever meant, if the concept never even applied to the first version of the first character to be called one.)
I think some that is additional interpolation on top of the already-making-stuff-up AVP answers it's based on.
Here are the actual AVP quotes
https://tfwiki.net/wiki/Source:Ask_Vector_Prime/Facebook#June_22.2C_2015
This makes very little sense without also saying the same thing about every...
It's just an expansive continuity that includes the majority of Japanese-original Transformers fiction.
It doesn't really merge in anything that was originally separate.
And if anything it has fewer contradictions and retcons than either Star Trek or UC Gundam.
The Transformers "continuity"...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.