Search results

They first announced Nexus Prime's name as "Nexus Maximus" (called that specifically because Hasbro didn't want "Prime" in his name), a name that turned out to already be in use for an unrelated product. The reason they didn't find this beforehand was because they'd checked with safe search on...

https://www.pcgamer.com/ford-files-patent-to-allow-self-driving-cars-to-drive-away-from-their-owners/

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/neuralink-musk-fda/

https://fortune.com/2023/02/28/volkswagen-car-net-abducted-child-gps-subscription-expired/amp/

Florida is not the only state forgetting that it can't go against the First Amendment: https://gizmodo.com/texas-abortion-websites-bill-internet-service-providers-1850178991

Every detailed explanation of anything in science is a theory, and there is no theory that wouldn't be modified if we found new relevant data. That doesn't mean the basics of the theory aren't "conclusively" known...and certainly not that the facts the theory explains are in dispute. That was...

Evolution is a fact. Not even creationists dispute that life has changed over time anymore, they just assert that there are limits to how much...and if they're obnoxious they'll refuse to admit that the word "evolution" applies to the part they do accept. (It does, though.) Also, speciation has...

Huh, I guess replacing proper verification with letting just anyone pay $8 can lead to something good.

... ... o_O

That evolution happens is a fact. The theory of evolution is the accepted explanation of how it happens...and is literally more certain than the current theory of gravity.

Where did they ever tell a "Siege" story that didn't have Bumblebee in it? While I don't like they do this either, Hasbro actually uses the words "inspired by" to mean "exactly accurate to" so often I'm not sure they know that isn't what it means. Siege definitely wasn't even inspired by "G1...

Not legally, since we do have separation of church and state. And there was a big court case in 2005 that ruled that "intelligent design" was still creationism.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/02/scott-adams-dilbert-cancelled-over-racist-rant-elon-musk-attacks-media.html

They're both Cheetor and the second one is almost certainly closer to what he looks like in the movie. The (non-Studio Series) Rise of the Beasts line appears to be based on earlier designs.

And double 🤬 https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/02/tennessees-legislature-gives-trans-youth-1-year-to-detransition/ Of course that monster is responsible.

As if there weren't already enough ethical concerns with AI art, now this: