Search results

There actually IS a race: but it's an ecomonic one. The corporate media wants trump to win, because a trump win will mean deregulation and tax breaks. And boy oh boy do the media owners want that deregulation and tax breaks.

Trump has been licensing his likeness since the 80's. He never does any of the work, he lets others do that, and he takes his piece right off the top. No effort required on his part, just income and he's not responsible for stuff like infrastructure, taxes, returns or customer service.

In US election, money is speech and volume of speech is victory. Down ballot races are pretty much unilaterally suffering under trumps RNC because money that was raised by lesser electors is being funneled to trump. This is literally the same thing as calling cruze's wife ugly and then making...

I would be down for that. His was the only cyberverse figure I wanted.

Eh, let the campaigns or the individuals pay for security: otherwise your taxes pay for cops and 911 services.

It's a solution, certainly. No one will do it. Trump won't willingly give up a source of income OR free bodyguards. Republicans in general will fight any legislation attempting to do this act, and democrats won't bring any such legislation forward because of how badly republicans will spin it...

Welp, there we go then. It was fun while it lasted.

It has not: the secret service has been badly in the red since they had to start securing trumps body.

I think that's the definition of buyers remorse.

The next major one will probably be the EU, and I am looking forward to seeing what happens there.

That's been his motive all along: it's why some of the campaign infrastructure is and always has been in trump properties, paying full value on the rent.

Yeah, I think you might be right. I didn't imagine I could think less of trump supporters: but you managed to make it happen man, congrats!

Oh no, most of them are entirely wise to the grift, but have been convinced that every time they buy that crap they're "beating the libtards" or some equally stupid jive. Most of them can't even afford it anymore, but they do it anyway cause it's not enough to be making monthly payments to...

It's used under liscence: so no, it's not going to a pac or the campaign. It's straight up profit going right into trumps wallet.

Or lied.

Did you read the patents the lawsuit is based on? They're so vague they literally describe MOVEMENT in games. Here's one, look: Gamesradar did an article about it...

Trump will argue he's already done two, and won both so he doesn't need to do another.

If palworld lifted code from nintendo, there would have been a lawsuit long before the game launched. Edit: could we maybe skip the disdain for the title itself and the company that owns it and focus on the lawsuit whose precedent could allow nintendo to sue every game title ever for violating...

We'll know more after pocketpair responds. I honestly can't find proper first party information right now. Lots of hyperbole and whining, but the common thread seems to be a fair bit of outrage that nintendo would try to patent (or maybe enforce a patent?) a basic game mechanic that's been used...

Apparently, the patents they've infringed upon were only filed by nintendo in the last few weeks? So it's entirely possible that pocketpair doesn't know what they've infringed on. It also seems like the core mechanics nintendo is trying to claim patent to will affect any game where you can throw...