Search results

Okay marky mark, I'll gladly pay you for the content and replace my friends with your bots... when your ******* bots can give me a hug.

"Bait and switch" is illegal in retail, why is it tolerated in politics?

I dunno; there's a built in, rabidly dedicated audience, that any right winger would die for... but also a LOT of bad press from everyone else around it. You won't be getting any new people to pay attention.

I was more talking about movies rather than games, but yeah, true. You'll also note it kinda sucked.

Sorry, I mean it needs to be headline news, every night and every single time. Media needs to put a magnifier on it when it happens.

Nope: they need to call out every instance of obvious political violence. And it needs to be publicly and nationally shamed as intolerable every. single. day. They won't do that either.

Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V. They modeled ONE leaf, then manipulated visible models on the tree and adjusted textures to make the majority dissimilar in the panning shot the camera does. Hundreds of hours on resources to make a set piece that (granted, tweaked and reused rampantly.) that gets 5 seconds of...

Dudes gonna make avatar 3 with three other people, and two of them will be cast services.

Understand: these people are sociopaths and psychopaths. If this is what they're suddenly willing to tell us they've done; what are they hiding?

That's literally all republicans do: they role back regulations for the environment, workers rights, oversight. Look at the divides between red and blue states on earnings, life span, overall health, education, unemployment. Trump basically only gave tax breaks to the richest of the rich. Not...

And if this what they're doing when there's the potential for consequence and repercussion... how would they act when they functionally absolute power?

There actually IS a race: but it's an ecomonic one. The corporate media wants trump to win, because a trump win will mean deregulation and tax breaks. And boy oh boy do the media owners want that deregulation and tax breaks.

Trump has been licensing his likeness since the 80's. He never does any of the work, he lets others do that, and he takes his piece right off the top. No effort required on his part, just income and he's not responsible for stuff like infrastructure, taxes, returns or customer service.

In US election, money is speech and volume of speech is victory. Down ballot races are pretty much unilaterally suffering under trumps RNC because money that was raised by lesser electors is being funneled to trump. This is literally the same thing as calling cruze's wife ugly and then making...

I would be down for that. His was the only cyberverse figure I wanted.

Eh, let the campaigns or the individuals pay for security: otherwise your taxes pay for cops and 911 services.

It's a solution, certainly. No one will do it. Trump won't willingly give up a source of income OR free bodyguards. Republicans in general will fight any legislation attempting to do this act, and democrats won't bring any such legislation forward because of how badly republicans will spin it...

Welp, there we go then. It was fun while it lasted.

It has not: the secret service has been badly in the red since they had to start securing trumps body.

I think that's the definition of buyers remorse.