I'll be shocked if it takes them that long. They probably had articles of impeachment written up and ready to go the minute they walked in the door this session, and the only thing stopping them from presenting them immediately was that they had to go through all the boring routine stuff like...
There's always someone to fire. Even if the person you think should be fired has made it impossible to fire them, in which case you find who the hell let that happen and fire that guy.
DX has been rereleased on so many platforms at this point, I'm pretty sure whatever data they'd need to bring the original to any modern platform without just running it in an emulator was lost a long time ago.
If the Republicans want to lash out at their former corporate overlords, I say let 'em. Either they'll learn the hard way how much power those people really have, or they'll succeed in toppling the oligarchy that's been keeping both parties from being much more than puppets of big business...
At least it will be a very public jive show. The more explosive, the better. When we come to the 2024 elections and nothing has gotten done in two years, no one will be able to pretend they don't know why, and Republican voters will be as demoralized as the rest of us are literally every year of...
Thing is, that used to be enough to motivate them to fall in lock-step behind whoever seemed to be the majority at the time, so as not to let their infighting keep them from getting a win. That's one big reason why they've always been so hard to beat: even if they can't agree on anything, they...
There's an old saying about the definition of insanity, but I never thought I'd see such a clear-cut case of it with my own eyes.
Yeah, that's what blows my mind here. This is one of the least significant things the Republicans could possibly find to split over right now. Like if there were a...
I don't think the President has that kind of authority; Congressional procedure is governed first by the Constitution, and then by rules enacted by Congress themselves. Even the Supreme Court could only weigh in if it's in question whether those rules are constitutional or not.
So what are they even doing? Are they just immediately holding the vote over and over again with nothing changed? Because that's... that's not how run-offs work.
But he did so using a made-up currency that threatened to disrupt Big Money, so he might actually get the book thrown at him if only to keep the usual lobbyists happy.
Hating Congress is something people of all political affiliations seem to be united in, but to their credit, they clearly have procedural rules in place to prevent anyone from splitting the vote, which is more than I can say for our own elections.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.