I believe the thinking here is that contraceptives let people have sex lots more and sex is evil unless it's between a married man and woman who are attempting to make a baby.
Looks like this was an error of numbers, as the actual figures (corrected in the digital version and later print editions) are 51%, 36% and 15%, so the bars are accurate, but the numbers on the bars are not.
The numbers shown are apparently for all the voters polled.
Here in New Zealand, everyone has roundly expressed disapproval at the whole stripping of rights in the US, even the right wing party which largely voted against the decriminalization of abortion when it came up a couple of years ago.
Except one right wing MP who posted a message of support on...
Trump continued to have rallies after he was elected president, so I strongly suspect he would have continued to do so even had he not been elected. I feel like the media coverage that would bring would have helped spread the lie. I doubt it would have reached the point of people trying to storm...
Assuming he does run, I'll be fascinated to see who his VP pick is, since I am sure "will you help me take over as dictator for life" will be one of the things they will have to agree to before he picks them.
Why is it always Hitler?
Also:
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/09/1103925150/michigan-candidate-for-governor-ryan-kelley-arrested-by-fbi-for-jan-6-involvemen?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
A vote of confidence is going to happen at 6pm which will decide if Boris Johnson stays or goes:
https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live-news/boris-johnson-no-confidence-vote-06-06-2022/index.html
The Tories really need to screen their candidates better:
https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/tory-mp-rape-arrest-man-in-50s-in-custody-on-suspicion-of-rape-released-on-bail-3698151
Flamethrowers, knives, zip ties: banned
Guns: still allowed
Wait, aren't flamethrowers just guns that shoot fire instead of bullets? Why aren't they covered under the second amendment?
It would discourage companies from buying and hoarding old IP, but as far as I can tell, it's only Disney that is both doing that and over the net worth threshold.
Hell, they could probably avoid the penalty altogether by breaking off parts of their company into smaller companies.
One problem I can see is if, say, Google bought a company that owned IP from more than 56 years ago, that IP would presumably instantly fall into the public domain.
Hawley's Disney revenge bill limits copyright to 56 years for major corporations:
https://www.hawley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2022-05/Copyright%20Clause%20Restoration%20Act.pdf
There's a clause limiting it to companies/people worth more than $150 billion and that produce substantial works...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.