I actually agree. It'd be VERY interesting to learn about what the Force's motivations and desires in all of this. It would take away from the mystique of it all, but I can't help but wonder.
Especially for "creating" Anakin in the first place. Because if you look at everything he did, and if we assume it all went according to the Force's plans more or less...it seems like the Force just wanted to get rid of both the Jedi and the Sith. Lucas himself has probably said that isn't the case. But, I don't know how else to look at it, given everything that happened.
And, again, if we do assume the Force just wants to create more Force...that might actually make sense? The Jedi and the Sith both limited how much they let themselves grow. They were both "limiting" organizations, in their own ways. The Jedi basically forced everyone they could find out of the gene pool, not usually allowing them to have their own families. And the Sith had the Rule of Two, and kept killing each other, anyway. Both of these organizations were limiting how many new Force Users could be around at any one time. Neither really encouraged Force Users to make more Force Users, like the Force may want. So...they both had to go!
Unless we just assume the Force is shepherding everyone towards some ideal utopia. But...that doesn't seem too likely given the Sequel Trilogy. I mean, there's usually a baby boom after a big war. So...is the Force just engineering these conflicts just to expand the population? Sometimes you need a forest fire to make the ground more fertile for the next generation?
I'll admit, I can't think of anything better for a motivation that fits the evidence we have. I wish I could. It feels...odd to imagine the Force as a "wild wolf" that doesn't like to be "chained" by the Sith, but also encourages it's "pack" to spread and thus being opposed to the Jedi, too. It feels...reductive? But, I think that does fit what we've seen the best.
So, yes, I'm not sure if the Force is actually a pure good or not. But...it IS something you have to deal with. Because it seems able to manipulate things to get it's way one way or another. It's something you have to live with in this universe. And trying to work against it doesn't tend to go well, for anyone.
Ideally, yes. In practice? Not so much. Just ask the Trade Federation, or the Seperatists, or the Pirates, or the Hutts.
That's the thing about the Jedi being so closely connected to the Republic. It's VERY rare for the Jedi to not take the Republic's side on matters. The Jedi very much lean Republic. They like to position themselves as more or less being "neutral". The peace makers. The negotiators. But, when those negotiations go south, out come the lightsabers.
I mean, this IS a action franchise. If they didn't do that, there wouldn't be a story. And they're usually justified because the other side usually shoots first. But, still, it does feel like it should be a bigger conflict with their beliefs than it is. That's why the Jedi's attachment to the Republic was a bad thing. They became more about enforcing the law, than speaking the Will of the Force. It becomes more about protecting the Republic's interests, rather than strictly doing what needs to be done. Even if those two do align, most of the time.
Well, that's the dramatic irony of it all, isn't it? Anakin does tend to put his own feelings first and foremost.
And, again, ideally, that would be the way it all works. But, in practice? I don't see Anakin EVER being too sympathetic toward the Sand People. If they threaten those he loves, he WILL cut them. Even if he had found Shmi alive, those guys would have been in for a beating, at least.
That's the thing about connections. They lead to preferences. You will always end up having some people you favor more than others. And, ideally, the Jedi should be as neutral as possible while dealing with these conflicts. Which is why the rule against attachments does make some sense.
It seems to me, like attachments for Force Users is a lot like alcohol. Now, some people CAN handle it...but other people can't. And the risk you run with Force Users is so high that it's usually not worth taking that risk, if you can help it. Not when they can drop a mountain on you, if they get too angry. So, I still think the lack of attachments makes sense.
As for isolation being a bad thing...I feel like the franchise as a whole disagrees with that.
Obi-Wan ended up being pretty isolated for most of his life in order to protect Luke. And that turned out for the best, because it allowed Luke to grow up safely.
Yoda was definitely isolated for a good chunk of his later years. And that turned out for the best, since he has able to survive the Purge, in order to train Luke. In fact, Luke going back out into the world to face Vader too early is treated like a bad thing. Luke arguably "should" have remained isolated a little longer. It works out for the best, but still.
By the time of the Sequel Trilogy, Luke ended up being pretty isolated. And...that's kind of treated like a bad thing, I'll admit. But, it does allow Rey to get the training she needed. Plus...Porgs! So...let's say half-and-half?
And by the time the Skywalker Saga is over...Rey seems to be isolating herself back on the Moisture Farm. Maybe. It's unclear. We'll see what happens if they ever follow up on her story.
"Isolation" doesn't seem to be treated as bad thing in this franchise. It's a type of self-sacrifice, which these stories usually reward. Isolation means peace, which Force Users sometimes need to re-center themselves. It's rarely treated like "the wrong choice". The only exception really comes from The Last Jedi, which famously loved to subvert ALL of the tropes that Star Wars has. So, that's kind of a outlier.
Now, it's true that none of these people STAY isolated. They all end up getting found by someone and helping out. But...in almost every case, that does also lead to their deaths. Going INTO isolation saves their lives. Coming OUT of isolation kills them.
I feel like there is a common lesson here. "The only way to find peace is to remove yourself from the chaos of society". And this isn't just something Star Wars does, either. How many movies or shows ends with the main characters moving to a peaceful farm in the country? Or workaholic business person taking a lower-paying job in a small town? Away from the hustle and bustle of the city? People being together breeds conflict, it's just human nature. In order to find your happy ending, you have to find the people you belong with, and remove as many other outsiders as possible from the equation that can ruin it. Being happy with "less" is a good thing, it means you're being less greedy. Perhaps that's a twisted way to take that lesson. But, it's common enough wisdom.
So, I don't think the Jedi Order's isolationist tendencies are really meant to be a failing. If anything, I think it's the opposite. Getting too much involved in the politics of the Republic is what the problem was. The Jedi Order tried to have it both ways, being a part of the Republic, but also kind of apart. And it just didn't work.
...And I know that seems contradictory to what the Force itself most likely "wants". If Force Users exist to make more Force Users, why is isolation a good thing? Well...I don't know! I guess you can argue that being lonely for a good long while makes you more receptive to affection later? (Which NEVER happens!) Or maybe the Force just REALLY wanted the Jedi and Sith eliminated so it could spread more freely without so much oversight later? (Which feels dark for this franchise.) But, I never claimed that Star Wars consistently written!
Last edited:
