She invited them to go through a different door than the one ICE was guarding. The guy went into the same hallway and outran them.She's skating pretty close. Here's the statutes I found that she's charged under
Obstruction: "Whoever corruptly,or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communicationinfluences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States,or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—Shall be..."
Concealment: "Whoever harbors or conceals any person for whose arrest a warrant or process has been issued under the provisions of any law of the United States, so as to prevent his discovery and arrest, after notice or knowledge of the fact that a warrant or process has been issued for the apprehension of such person, shall be..."
For concealment, I'd say it comes down to whether an Administrative Warrant qualifies as a "warrant" or "arrest" under the law. For obstruction...if these were otherwise open court proceedings, and she used her authority as a judge to refuse them entry, and then led the subject through another exit only accessible to judicial personnel...well, it's not getting dismissed on its face, absent some federal precedent I'm unfamiliar with.
That's not on her, that's on them. Spend some time on the treadmill, boys.
As far as what you've presented, the statute. The argument I'd start with as a lawyer is the word "corruptly". I would then make the argument that showing the individual to a different door does not influence, obstruct, or impedes anything. He went into the same hallway where ICE was. Just down the hall. Obstruction won't stick.
In terms of concealment, a better argument could be made except that the chief judge had previously stated that administrative warrants are not to be pursued in the courthouse. As they are not judicial warrants and have no real weight of the justice system behind them, they can make and personally enforce that ruling.
This is a nothing case. And the big splashy arrest by Kash and his FBI team was done specifically to create an atmosphere of fear and tell even judges that they had better not get in Trump's way. Pure intimidation, nothing more.
But, like with tariffs, I bet if we see massive pushback instead of capitulation, Trump will blink first.