Yes, but there very much was by the time T30 and TR came around, the instances we were talking about.One thing to note about IDW is that when it started, there WAS no toyline.
Yes, but there very much was by the time T30 and TR came around, the instances we were talking about.One thing to note about IDW is that when it started, there WAS no toyline.
But even that had its hiccups like Crosscut being a glorified nobody and the whole mess with Jihaxus and Starscream's body changes.Thrilling 30 was specifically made to be "IDW1: The Toyline", but only after the IDW1 comics had already long since established themselves. Many of the toys were based on comic-original designs, instead of the comic designs being based on toys. In Thrilling 30's case, it was made to advertise the comic, rather than the comic being made to advertise the toyline.
My favourite part about TR's comic run was that just before it started Optimus decapitated Galvatron (things got kinda Bayesque for a moment) and everyone rightfully went "oh ofc Galvatron's coming back as a Headmaster" because he was in the first wave of TR toys and he lost his head right before the TR comic line started.
And then... it just didn't happen. Like the setup was right there. It was perfect, and just didn't happen.
A close second was that they did use Sentinel/Infinitus and Blackrock/Alpha Trion but got weirdly indignant about actually selling the toys in the line.
Sentinel showed up with his old (non-toy) Megatron: Origins body wearing black modular armour over it that vaguely looked like his TR toy but not really (the thing doesn't have any black on it) and Alpha Trion was just normal IDW Alpha Trion without even a hint of his unicorn/lion mode from the toyline.
Only they had Infinitus cut off his head and wear his body so you kinda had some representation of the play pattern only not really because the Alpha Trion body didn't look like the Alpha Trion toy. And then Infinitus gave Alpha Trion's body to Blackrock/Sovereign who then turned into an Alpha Trion head.... for reasons presumably to sell the toy, only it didn't look like toy.
Meanwhile Galvatron was still headless, had a Headmaster toy on the shelf in the line the comic arc was named after, and just stayed dead.
It's almost art in how IDW both did and didn't want to play along at the same time. Like f'in Gollum was writing the comics for four months.
"WE WANTS TO SELL THE TOYS!"
"NO WE HATES IT!"
Honestly it's a little silly but I miss the 80s Marvel Comic era of toy shilling. Where Transformers and GIJoe books had to near constantly introduce new toys while telling their story.
It was one of those challenges that forced the writer to be more creative to tell stories around it. But also, it just gave those books a certain pace and feel that no modern comics have had because no one is forced to tell stories that way and darn it having grown up on those books I'm nostalgic for that feel.
Like next time someone gets the liscense and starts over I'd love either a book that follows whatever the current Generation releases were religiously or one that goes back and does things in order. A year staring 84 toys, then a year staring 85 toys and so through 1990.
-ZacWilliam, or at least a miniseries with one issue spotlighting characters from each year.
Nooooot entirely.Same thing with Dreamwave's G1 comics, too.
Yep. And they used Dreamwave art for the boxes.Weren't G1 reissues coming out at the time, too?
Everything Hasbro put out at that time used Dreamwave art. It was Hasbro's new "house style".No, but the launch of a G1 comic and a G1 reissue line that used the new comic's art seems like a bit more than just a coincidence.
The comic buying public is used to stand-alones and one-offs and mini series. I don't think it would have been an issue.That would've been pretty fun stuff on its own, but I guess it might've been viewed as either confusing or dividing the audience.
I don't disagree, but I think I was considering it more in terms of IDW as a publisher with perhaps smaller margins than the traditional big two -- and at the time they already had a number of things running alongside the "main" books, which were already two books. Churning out another book per month might have not been seen as a good use of money (debatable), considering they also had Revolution and TAAO and other events and series going. And the movie books had themselves gotten wrapped up before even AOE, meaning one less non-IDWG1 continuity being published. (This is why I thought of shorter "backup" stories in each issue instead, but that would have complicated page allotments for the main book and for ads and whatnot.)The comic buying public is used to stand-alones and one-offs and mini series. I don't think it would have been an issue.
Yes! This is what I meant before. I'd rather have just had like a 3-year story or something covering Prime Wars as its own thing, rather than shoehorning sometimes clumsily into the regular IDW continuity (and making it even harder to follow in retrospect from all the titles they had floating around. Primus help you if you weren't reading these as they came out...).If I were Hasbro I'd have just asked for a Titans Return miniseries or something, disconnected from the main comic. Or run it as backup stories in the main comic.
That's on IDW. More Transformers content might have juiced sales (even if it was a one-off Titans Return tie-in) than that G-d awful MASK series. Or trying to make the Visionaries a thing.Churning out another book per month might have not been seen as a good use of money (debatable), considering they also had Revolution and TAAO and other events and series going.
I'd say that Skybound does it properly. One, they're not flooding the market with concepts and titles.The Hasbroverse killed late IDW1 for me. I don't care about Visionairies or MASK or Rom or whatever else, I just wanted to see Transformers.