Okay, so... normally I don't do this for politicians, but... I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt here. I think he was literally just trying to make chit-chat and is so far separated from the homeless man's reality that he simply doesn't know how.
The bible was also created and constantly edited by an organization pretty much bent on oppressing the population. God didn't curse humans with multiple languages, the owners of the tower of babel did, and it was strictly so folks couldn't unionize.
There's like 8 billion of us: even as a statistical anomaly, there will always be bastards. If we wait to do research and development for people to stop being bastards, we'd still be hunter/gatherers.
So the best we can do is educate, build social programs, and create communities where we...
While I agree with you in principle: being a progressive means we have to bring EVERYONE with us, otherwise it's just another tyranny. We could lament the fact that the bad people are also able to enjoy a global, real time communication network; or we could improve our social systems and...
The core aspect of the internet: wireless, instant communication, is not and never was a mistake. It literally cannot be a mistake. Facilitating communication and community is never a mistake.
How we use and implemented it? Oh, ABSOLUTELY a ******* mistake.
Really? Cause every aspect of every crypto thing has always been a ponzi scheme. Which is kind of why both NFTs and crypto currencies are kinda failing.
True, but that hasn't actually worked that well for him. Sure; judge cannon was a total rod polisher, but the rest of the republican judges he's passed in front of have ruled against him.
Problem being with that is the republicans that voted to impeach trump will not vote for a law which restricts the powers of the presidency, or ensures consequences for their actions because those same republicans might be president some day and they want to get away with all the jive like trump...
Alright, so... I kinda get the whole taking it slowly thing. Given the office in question of the person in focus: you want an airtight case because you are literally setting precendent that will be the bedrock of similar decisions going forward.
This would have applied if it was literally any...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.