And the thing is, the original animated version of Maleficent didn't need fixing because she was already excellent. She was sophisticated, regal, intelligent, cunning, and competent. She was so thoroughly evil because she LOVED being so. She relished making others suffer. It brought her pure joy and entertainment, unabashedly. She didn't care how evil others thought of her. She was better than that, better than them, and she knew that. And because she knew she was better, the fact that she didn't get invited to baby Aurora's birthday party was taken as a mockery of her greatness, not her villainy. Anyone could call her wicked and spiteful all they wanted, because she saw that only as flattery. But mock her obvious superiority and that's going too far. She carried herself with an air of upperclass malice, wore her malevolence on her sleeve, and did so openly with pride.
Having Maleficent depicted as "not evil" goes against not just the core essence of what made the character great to begin with, but even goes against her very name. Why is she even still named "Maleficent" if she isn't malefic at all? What, did her parents hate her as a baby and decide to give her an inherently evil name just for kicks?
Conversely, what made Wicked work better was the fact that the Wicked Witch of the West was originally just a thug, a lowlife bully whose whole personality amounted to mere scum and petty sadism. She was the kind of person who gleefully loved scaring people and emotionally tormenting them just for the fun of it. A cackling madwoman whose campy antics would give eyerolls of annoyance to the kind of self-respecting villain that the animated Malelcent was.
Wicked took something with little-to-no substance and gave it substance by reimagining it in an engaging manner. The live-action Maleficent movie took something that was already very substantially good and engaging in its own right and flipped the switch on it in a very shallow manner, completely missing what made the original so great to begin with.
Having Maleficent depicted as "not evil" goes against not just the core essence of what made the character great to begin with, but even goes against her very name. Why is she even still named "Maleficent" if she isn't malefic at all? What, did her parents hate her as a baby and decide to give her an inherently evil name just for kicks?
Conversely, what made Wicked work better was the fact that the Wicked Witch of the West was originally just a thug, a lowlife bully whose whole personality amounted to mere scum and petty sadism. She was the kind of person who gleefully loved scaring people and emotionally tormenting them just for the fun of it. A cackling madwoman whose campy antics would give eyerolls of annoyance to the kind of self-respecting villain that the animated Malelcent was.
Wicked took something with little-to-no substance and gave it substance by reimagining it in an engaging manner. The live-action Maleficent movie took something that was already very substantially good and engaging in its own right and flipped the switch on it in a very shallow manner, completely missing what made the original so great to begin with.