So 12 then,i turn 30 next month fam
If you’re not making *any* changes, then you just want a reissue.all shitposting aside, i really do think that going so far in the sunbowification of ML ironhide is like...missing the point? idk i feel it's one thing to offer 'anime versions' where they're done in the cartoon colors or like having minor optional aesthetic changes (like how ML sunstreker has integrated fists + optional 'toy-style fists' or how ML grimlock can have his head positioned either in a normal position in robot mode or way far back like in g1) but idk maybe i'll have to see more than just a sillhouetted teaser image but going so far as to make a 'what if g1 ironhide's character model existed as a toy in 1984' is like...idk that feels straying too far from what missing link should be?
I see the sled's cannons on the inside of his back and the drone's seat face inside his windshield. He may end up being more Duocon-like than we expected after all.But it's Missing Link. I want the original robot mode. This fails the assignment.
I was gonna say, I'd like this AS a mainline take. It's like a more fleshed-out Earthrise take (which was good but hobbled by just being a dressed-up Siege design).Not going to lie. I like it. I'd take that over Masterpiece, Earthrise, or SS86 any day.
But it's Missing Link. I want the original robot mode. This fails the assignment.
Again, it would need a whole different torso and arms. Otherwise, it doesn't matter if there's an alternate transformation that gives us something close to the original toy's layout. It's not going to pass the "Looks like it could be the original if you don't touch any of the added articulation" test that made Missing Link so neat.I see the sled's cannons on the inside of his back and the drone's seat face inside his windshield. He may end up being more Duocon-like than we expected after all.