Traitor Watch - The 45 & 47 Thread
- Thread starter Wheelimus
- Start date
So what I'm getting from this is that Marco Rubio was too cheap and/or lazy to hunt down the same shoes in his actual size and secretly buy those and stash the ones he got from Trump away. Instead, he not only makes himself look silly but risks Trump noticing his too-big shoes and catching on that he was lied to.
He's probably betting on Trump being too stupid, lazy, and senile to notice. Which, to be fair, is a safe bet, but there's always a chance someone else would notice and tell Trump about it to get him mad.
The Curious Case of the Disappearing Data
Last night I tried to access a dataset I’ve used many times before.
substack.com
Because he's a senile moron.
Uh... whoa. That'll piss off trump something fierce, and I am here for it.
So do you have an actual link to that? Because I literally typed that text into Google and it came up with nothing.
Yeah, I thought it was in his replies to other posts since I can't see those without logging in, someone else checked the feed and didn't see them, so if he posted it he deleted it.
This is his feed if someone wants to double-check, though. https://twitter.com/Keir_Starmer
And yeah, looks like my original source agrees: https://infosec.exchange/@Lightfighter/116252235416017911 This was where I got it from.
This is his feed if someone wants to double-check, though. https://twitter.com/Keir_Starmer
And yeah, looks like my original source agrees: https://infosec.exchange/@Lightfighter/116252235416017911 This was where I got it from.
Given how “source illiterate” modern social media is? It might well be something created just to stir the pot. I recall seeing a comment/report that Trump was “mulling” over the idea of removing the US from the NATO alliance (since nobody wants to help him clean up the mess he made in the Gulf). Frankly, the Starmer “fake post” has more balls than I would expect from a real post from a politician.
Possibly. Mastodon(especially that instance) is usually better about these sort of things because it's not algorithm-driven, and that instance is aimed towards Information Security professionals who should know about sourcing. I would have linked him to begin with but there wasn't anything else informative in his original post(if the screenshot had been correct).
Which is functionally an unfair statement because trump has been "mulling over" pulling the US from nato since his first abortion of a mandate. To whit, while I agree with the not-real starmer post: no politician has that kind of ballsack: because such statements are career enders. If the US doesn't get him, his voters will when he is completely incapable of living up to it.
This is where AI has a genuine use case in this stupid new world of ours. It takes mere seconds to have Grok scour a gazillion records and say "No, this isn't a real post." or "This is unrelated footage from 2023." It is easier than ever to create a hoax, but harder than ever to do it without getting caught.
I don't know. We could replace a few cable news hosts with this thing.
FB friend: