Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Squawkbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

Please don't post Youtube videos in the chat box. The forums software auto embeds them. 

@  2017 : (17 October 2017 - 05:56 PM)

It scared me!

@  Kalidor : (17 October 2017 - 05:42 PM)

Yes - here is more information - https://www.battleforthenet.com/

@  Darth Gonzo : (17 October 2017 - 05:36 PM)

Hello?

@  Evac : (17 October 2017 - 04:39 PM)

Yeah, it's the Allspark.

@  wonko the sane? : (17 October 2017 - 04:35 PM)

Okay, so it is the allspark doing it, and not some piece of malware I need to run a system scan over, that's basically all I wanted to know.

@  Evac : (17 October 2017 - 04:34 PM)

If, say, Hillary or Bernie was president, we'd have a chance, but with the current administration... We're pretty much hugged.

@  Evac : (17 October 2017 - 04:32 PM)

I don't know why we're even bothering; there's no way in hell a GOP-controlled congress would listen to common proles like us.

@  Evac : (17 October 2017 - 04:32 PM)

Yeah, so did I.

@  wonko the sane? : (17 October 2017 - 04:19 PM)

Okay, so I just got a pop up telling me I need to call congress about the FCC killing net neutrality. Anyone else get that?

@  Dracula : (17 October 2017 - 09:45 AM)

I'd probably use a primer coat on either of them.

@  unluckiness : (17 October 2017 - 07:21 AM)

Wonder if Overboard or Crashbash would be easier to paint over. Generally dark colors are harder but then again, screaming fuschia seems like it'd be difficult to cover too.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (16 October 2017 - 02:46 PM)

Damn, the shoutbox won't accept those characters. I mean "open-mid back unrounded vowel" on Wikipedia.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (16 October 2017 - 02:46 PM)

Λ

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (16 October 2017 - 02:45 PM)

@Bass X0 Ha, I think some Asian accents of English, that mispronunciation would be considered standard, as those accents lack [ʌ].

@  MEDdMI : (16 October 2017 - 12:08 PM)

She's the last thing you hear before your doom.

@  Noideaforaname : (15 October 2017 - 07:34 PM)

The cat can talk?!

@  MEDdMI : (15 October 2017 - 06:30 PM)

TMM's first cat was Cookie b/c that's the first word he said when he saw her

@  Bass X0 : (15 October 2017 - 05:34 PM)

Reminds me of when my nephew was one year old and my sister got him a puppy. He couldn't say puppy properly and it sounded like poppy, so Poppy is what they called her.

@  Arazyr : (15 October 2017 - 02:36 PM)

Yeah. I thought it had some interesting informational articles too.

@  Bass X0 : (15 October 2017 - 01:59 PM)

does anyone else miss the ToyFare magazine? I just read it for the pictures and jokes rather than using it as a serious guide for buying and selling toys.

@  Arazyr : (15 October 2017 - 09:21 AM)

Uncle Bobby Peach, baby! Uncle Bobby Peach!

@  Arazyr : (15 October 2017 - 09:21 AM)

Last night, playing Mario Kart with my daughter, I misread Baby Peach as "Bobby Peach".

@  Onyxstrike : (15 October 2017 - 09:03 AM)

Yeah, I might've forgotten that the Beast is pretty much just a mindless killing machine. That's pretty much what I get for going off of the TFWiki summaries without having actually read any of it.

@  tffan01 : (15 October 2017 - 08:34 AM)

@Onyxstrike Well, to be fair, the quality of the story aside, Beast Within illustrates the fact that Dinobots are feral in nature, with what would happen if they actually lost control. That's a character flaw in a way, correct? 

@  2017 : (15 October 2017 - 08:21 AM)

Send me a PM if you need help getting to the true ending, also.

@  Strafe : (15 October 2017 - 08:15 AM)

Thinking about quirky robots occupies 30% of my brain's daily processing power. I can't remember birthdays and I never know where my phone is, but it's totally worth it.

@  2017 : (15 October 2017 - 08:03 AM)

Yay, I look forward to your dealings with quirky robots!

@  Strafe : (15 October 2017 - 08:01 AM)

Definitely, I started setting aside funds a month ago for the inevitable Black Friday digital sales in the Playstation and Xbox stores. Going to be ready this year, and that's one of the many games on my list!

@  2017 : (15 October 2017 - 07:30 AM)

Hey Strafe will you ever play Nier: Automata?

@  Onyxstrike : (15 October 2017 - 07:19 AM)

Plus, The Beast Within is overall not a very good story.

@  Onyxstrike : (15 October 2017 - 07:19 AM)

The problem is is that Victory's dreams are meant to prey on the Dinobot's character flaws. For instance, Grimlock downing every Decepticon in his path, but falling for Starscream's begging for mercy schtick, preys on his arrogence. What character flaws does The Beast Within prey on? Nothing. The entire premise of the book was to please the many fans who posed the many hypothetical "What if the Dinobots combined?" scenarios way back when, with a gratuitous death count to boot.

@  Bass X0 : (15 October 2017 - 05:51 AM)

What's wrong with wanting it to be a canon dream sequence?

@  TheMightyMol... : (14 October 2017 - 01:14 PM)

go home bass you are drunk

@  Bass X0 : (14 October 2017 - 12:15 PM)

My fanon is that The Beast Within is a follow up the Marvel UK annual story Victory. In Victory, the Dinobots are trapped within a dream world, unable to wake up - each one having dreams, ending in the Dinobots having another dream then waking up in a comic issue. My fanon is that The Beast Within is their final dream that finally pushes them into waking up.

@  TheMightyMol... : (14 October 2017 - 10:25 AM)

As long as that means The Beast Within is still non-canon, I'm fine with it.

@  Locoman : (14 October 2017 - 09:29 AM)

When everything is canon, nothing is.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (14 October 2017 - 09:25 AM)

The TF multiverse is an arbitrary concept. Whatever an author thinks, goes.

@  TheMightyMol... : (14 October 2017 - 05:59 AM)

Trypticon vs Deathsaurer. Make it happen!

@  tffan01 : (14 October 2017 - 05:31 AM)

Going by AVP, is Spider-Man and Zoids comic canon to the TF multiverse???

@  D Immortalis : (14 October 2017 - 12:37 AM)

stop that! we shall never speak of the "Embarassment", 'lest we be punished with more like it! =]

@  Pennpenn : (13 October 2017 - 08:23 PM)

Would the mutant heads have been on the headmasters or on the bodies (sort of like TR Galvatron's "helmet")?

@  Shrug : (13 October 2017 - 08:05 PM)

Alternate reality: Beast Wars mutant heads really took off. Nearly every Transformers since '96 has featured them. The big complaint against the line-wide gimmick in TR isn't being headmasters, it's the lack of mutant heads.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (13 October 2017 - 07:03 PM)

Car TF molds get made all the time; bat TF molds don't. I feel like that justifies making a new Convobat from a mold configured highly unlike the original.

@  Bass X0 : (13 October 2017 - 05:56 PM)

and yet Mindwipe is good enough to use as Convobat.

@  Shrug : (13 October 2017 - 03:19 PM)

I'm okay with that.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (13 October 2017 - 03:07 PM)

Takara seems to have decided that the TR Chromedome mold is unsuitable for anyone else besides Chromedome.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (13 October 2017 - 03:07 PM)

*shrug* No 21st century (Macromaster) Nightbeat toy seems to have satisfied a decent number of people, from what I understand.

@  Locoman : (13 October 2017 - 02:57 PM)

You could probably finagle a pretty good Nightbeat body from TR Chromedome, or even a heavy retool of Cogman.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (13 October 2017 - 02:44 PM)

Nightbeat in particular. Hasbro seems to love him.

@  Shrug : (13 October 2017 - 12:21 PM)

Yeah, they seem to be exploring every possible avenue of G1 now.


- - - - -

Fall of Cybertron not coming to PC


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
86 replies to this topic

#21 ZacWilliam1

ZacWilliam1
  • Citizen
  • 15647 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:49 AM

QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 16 2012, 09:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 17 2012, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Good, the less shoddy ports, the better. If it's developed on Console, keep it on Console.

There's a flaw in your reasoning. No need for it to be a "shoddy port".



Except time, money, and patience.

There is no reason people cannot put the effort in to make a good port and thereby gain additional income from the product.



Your missing the part where they've looked at the situation and said "We don't have the skills to do this as well as it should be done. The money isn't worth hiring out or the hit we'd take for doing it poorly. Let's stick with what we do well."

Just cause you wish to play it on the PC doesn't mean it would be a good idea for them to try and make it.


-ZacWilliam, Sure if they threw enough time and money at it they could probably make a decent port but they know better than us whether that's a good proposition for them.
Ever wonder about the speed of Turbofoxes?
Or the proverbial ailerons of Titanium Moosebots?

*Visit the one and only Cybertronic Bestiary.
For a mechazoologic tour of the mechanimals of Cybertron.


#22 2017

2017

    Merciless.

  • Citizen
  • 41968 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:50 AM

QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 17 2012, 12:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 17 2012, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Good, the less shoddy ports, the better. If it's developed on Console, keep it on Console.

There's a flaw in your reasoning. No need for it to be a "shoddy port".



Except time, money, and patience.

There is no reason people cannot put the effort in to make a good port and thereby gain additional income from the product.



Only if they have the effort to spare? FoC is based on a licensed product, which would definitely involve them having a deadline, as that comes with the territory of a larger franchise so that said franchise can pencil it in to their schedule. The studio creating it is not some big-name company who has crack teams all over the globe. High Moon has made exactly five games, and only one of them featured a PC version, which was WFC.

Basically, with a game like this, they had to pick consoles, because Transformers as a brand which attracts kids and younger players, who tend to have videogames consoles not high-spec PC gaming rigs. They did attempt a PC version with WFC, but obviously that wasn't commercially viable because they aren't doing it again.

Which isn't terribly surprising.


PM me if you're bored!


#23 Esser-Z

Esser-Z

    I'm never going down at the hands of the likes of you

  • Citizen
  • 32940 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:50 AM

QUOTE(ZacWilliam1 @ Feb 16 2012, 09:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 16 2012, 09:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Esser-Z @ Feb 17 2012, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(Hora Hora @ Feb 16 2012, 09:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Good, the less shoddy ports, the better. If it's developed on Console, keep it on Console.

There's a flaw in your reasoning. No need for it to be a "shoddy port".



Except time, money, and patience.

There is no reason people cannot put the effort in to make a good port and thereby gain additional income from the product.



Your missing the part where they've looked at the situation and said "We don't have the skills to do this as well as it should be done. The money isn't worth hiring out or the hit we'd take for doing it poorly. Let's stick with what we do well."

Just cause you wish to play it on the PC doesn't mean it would be a good idea for them to try and make it.


-ZacWilliam, Sure if they threw enough time and money at it they could probably make a decent port but they know better than us whether that's a good proposition for them.

Fair enough. But I'm a PC gamer. I'm allowed to gripe about bad ports and lacking ports. icon-fire.gif

#24 The Predaking

The Predaking

    Warlord is amazing!

  • Supporter
  • 37389 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 10:42 AM

Ehh. I was planning on getting it for the Xbox 360 anyways.

Restoring an Old Arcade Machine!

 

http://www.allspark....ade-game/page-2

 

 


#25 D.M

D.M
  • Citizen
  • 2630 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:25 AM

QUOTE(BB Shockwave @ Feb 16 2012, 02:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's especially surprising they'd cite these reasons, when WFC has gotten extremely good reviews for PC as well. And I never experienced any performance issues either.

I have, in multiplayer.
The online users counter is inaccurate. Sometimes it shows that no one is online even when there are.

Searching for available matches can often get stuck in a loop.

Friend list is glitchy and often I can't add anyone.

And then there's cheating.

#26 Quantumhawk

Quantumhawk

    Fight the Future

  • Retired Staff
  • 18489 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:40 AM

QUOTE(Powered Convoy @ Feb 16 2012, 07:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Waits for Quantumhawk to post...

Randy


LOL...I saw VP's post on Facebook and came here in a rampage all ready to throw a fit about it.


QUOTE(MrBlud @ Feb 16 2012, 07:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
(No server/room migration, no checks on cheater/hackers, no DLC cause they are jerks).



Well, never mind, looks like my work here is done.

Although you could add: no keyboard remapping, neutered framerate, no voice chat, no text chat, no cycle players option in Escalation, as well as a number of other glitches and problems.

#27 Creature SH

Creature SH

    Condimented

  • Supporter
  • 5673 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:40 AM

QUOTE(ZacWilliam1 @ Feb 16 2012, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How is this news to anyone?

They've been saying exactly this since they announced the game.

I second this. We've known this for about half a year.



j1GI7Gi.gif


#28 Year Zero

Year Zero

    New dawn rises. Behold the Lord of flies.

  • Supporter
  • 31219 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:42 AM

QUOTE(BB Shockwave @ Feb 16 2012, 08:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
- BB Shockwave, depends on what your definition of "gaming" is. But I am gonna take a guess and say you probably weren't born yet when some of us were playing games on ZX Spectrum or Commodore 64.

Hi there. I was born in 1970, and I've played games on all manner of consoles from early home PONG consoles, to the Fairchild Channel-F, to the Atari VCS and of course on down the line since then. I've also played computer games on the C64 and the C Vic-20, as well as the Atari 400 and 800, as well as several TANDY and Amiga models, the IBM PS2, and on up the line to the present day.

And yet I -STILL- don't care about them not porting it to the PC. The problem with PC ports is that there are a myriad of machines out there with different technical specifications, and that's just the commercially-released versions, and doesn't count home-built rigs like mine. I'd much rather them spend time on making the console versions as good as possible as opposed to spending valuable time on what would likely be a buggy PC port.

In conclusion: I understand that this bothers you, but don't project your ideas of what gaming means and who gamers are based on age. Its a mostly-meaningless distinction that doesn't accomplish anything other than hard-feelings.

"Don’t you see? Violence doesn’t end violence. It extends it." - The Tenth Doctor


 


#29 D.M

D.M
  • Citizen
  • 2630 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:47 AM

QUOTE(Creature SH @ Feb 16 2012, 05:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(ZacWilliam1 @ Feb 16 2012, 02:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How is this news to anyone?

They've been saying exactly this since they announced the game.

I second this. We've known this for about half a year.

Can't speak for others, but I was hoping they'd change their mind...

#30 Kalidor

Kalidor

    \_(ツ)_/

  • Owner
  • 59572 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 12:08 PM

In the article that the site you linked to actually references, they explain exactly why:

QUOTE
"I think there are a few things that are inherent in what PC consumers are looking for that frankly we didn't deliver good on."

Things like customizing your user interface, remapping your controls, and "some of the voice over stuff," Tieger continued. "A lot of that stuff is easy or comes inherently on the console."

Not so easy on the PC, as it turned out. "We were spread so thin that I feel like we barely served that audience. Then there were some issues with continued support that were frankly beyond our control, but at the same time did not create a great experience for PC gamers that got it."

Rather than attempt to create a third version of Fall of Cybertron that the developer couldn't properly support, High Moon decided to skip the PC altogether. It was a hard decision, but one that makes perfect sense.


Those are solid reasons.

#31 Specimen-17

Specimen-17

    In case of emergency, break dance

  • Supporter
  • 8079 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 12:27 PM

Well I'm disappointed. Never had any issues with single player WFC on the PC other than the lack of remapping controls, but that was only a minor inconvenience. Multiplayer is a joke for the reasons already stated, but I still play it anyway.

#32 OmegaX80

OmegaX80
  • Citizen
  • 1347 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:27 PM

It sounds like there was a lot of problems with the PC version of WFC. Maybe that is what led to their decision not make a PC version of FOC.

I am surprised that they can't figure it out. I don't play PC games, but was WFC that bad on a PC?

FEEDBACK THREADS

eBay
TFW2005
ALLSPARK

 


#33 Kalidor

Kalidor

    \_(ツ)_/

  • Owner
  • 59572 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:30 PM

I imagine he wishes he didn't say they couldn't figure it out when what he meant was that they couldn't afford to pump money into developing it because it would require a separate set of programmers.

#34 The Doctor Who

The Doctor Who

    Whether You Like it or Not

  • Supporter
  • 13877 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:33 PM

QUOTE(OmegaX80 @ Feb 16 2012, 01:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It sounds like there was a lot of problems with the PC version of WFC. Maybe that is what led to their decision not make a PC version of FOC.

I am surprised that they can't figure it out. I don't play PC games, but was WFC that bad on a PC?

I never really played the multi-player mode, so I can't comment on that. The single player mode was good enough for my taste, though a little clumsy. I never encountered any game-breaking bugs or anything.

Honestly... I don't think it was as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Most of what I hear seems to be in the realm of left out features, which, if they had more resources, they could probably fix for the sequel. But if they really don't, then I can understand why they'd just go for a console version.

Maybe they'll do a Wii version and I can play that. Anyone tried out Cybertron Adventures? How did that do?

#35 Dezarus

Dezarus

    Emperor of Destruction

  • Citizen
  • 1298 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 01:49 PM

Man this is so disappointing I feel the need to actually post. I was really looking forward to playing this but now, I guess I'll have to go without icon-screamer.gif

#36 Quantumhawk

Quantumhawk

    Fight the Future

  • Retired Staff
  • 18489 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 02:00 PM

QUOTE(The Doctor Who @ Feb 16 2012, 12:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Honestly... I don't think it was as bad as a lot of people make it out to be. Most of what I hear seems to be in the realm of left out features, which, if they had more resources, they could probably fix for the sequel. But if they really don't, then I can understand why they'd just go for a console version.

Maybe they'll do a Wii version and I can play that. Anyone tried out Cybertron Adventures? How did that do?


It's hard for me to understand why they didn't have resources to fix or develop the PC version given that they had SALES of the PC version to go off of. DLC should have paid for itself if they'd released it in a timely fashion. I guess it's easier to just take whatever profits you can get and call it a day rather than recycle them into improving the product.

The Wii version was a completely different game. I understand it was ok for what it was.

#37 Admiral Lilwall

Admiral Lilwall

    Lilwall Leader

  • Citizen
  • 1330 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 02:46 PM

no! icon-screamer.gif

that stinks to high moon.

no game for me then either
'Words do not win wars. That is a tragedy.'
Lilwall.net

#38 Creature SH

Creature SH

    Condimented

  • Supporter
  • 5673 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:21 PM

QUOTE(Quantumhawk @ Feb 16 2012, 08:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It's hard for me to understand why they didn't have resources to fix or develop the PC version given that they had SALES of the PC version to go off of. DLC should have paid for itself if they'd released it in a timely fashion. I guess it's easier to just take whatever profits you can get and call it a day rather than recycle them into improving the product.





Let's not forget that this is Activision we are dealing with. Massive profits or death, there is no middle ground.

Edited by Creature SH, 16 February 2012 - 07:24 PM.

j1GI7Gi.gif


#39 Powered Convoy

Powered Convoy

    Skywarp Connoisseur

  • Retired Staff
  • 59647 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:43 PM

I think you mean or death, you had me confused for a second there. icon-wildride.gif

Randy


#40 abates

abates
  • Supporter
  • 4045 posts

Posted 16 February 2012 - 04:48 PM

They didn't release WFC on PC here - I had to buy a PS3 to play it. The news they weren't even going to bother making a PC port for FOC didn't come as much of a surprise.
TFWiki.net - The Transformers Wiki: Making sure people remember the Beast is a thing that happened.
Follow the Transformers Wiki on Twitter!