Jump to content


Toggle shoutbox Squawkbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

Please don't post Youtube videos in the chat box. The forums software auto embeds them. 

@  TheMightyMol... : (23 July 2017 - 06:29 PM)

Once again, there is pain, I bring flame, I bring cold. I'm the blood red sandman, coming home.

@  Evac : (23 July 2017 - 06:26 PM)

Yo, when Team Skull meets you, they don't even greet you!

@  LBD "Nyt... : (23 July 2017 - 06:23 PM)

Yooooooo

@  Evac : (23 July 2017 - 06:15 PM)

Yo.

@  LBD "Nyt... : (23 July 2017 - 06:14 PM)

Once more, I have returned. w00t.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (23 July 2017 - 02:01 PM)

Macross Delta sucks but I listen to the music anyway.

@  MEDdMI : (23 July 2017 - 09:46 AM)

And dealing with me.

@  TheMightyMol... : (23 July 2017 - 08:47 AM)

Don't forget the rock music and D&D.

@  unluckiness : (23 July 2017 - 07:52 AM)

He certainly doesn't have the time to be employed full-time what with all the war-stoking, dinosaur fossil burying, pornographing and etc

@  TheMightyMol... : (23 July 2017 - 06:44 AM)

Look, I'm TRYING, okay?

@  Bass X0 : (23 July 2017 - 06:40 AM)

The devil is a part-timer!

@  Nevermore : (23 July 2017 - 06:32 AM)

I always took it to be a catch-all term for "person or thing of the same name" regardless of which came first.

@  PlutoniumBoss : (22 July 2017 - 10:06 PM)

So technically it could be either way and not be wrong, but it is more apt to be Kalidor's example.

@  PlutoniumBoss : (22 July 2017 - 10:05 PM)

one that has the same name as another; especially : one who is named after another or for whom another is named

@  Kalidor : (22 July 2017 - 09:45 PM)

I think the official meaning is that a namesake is the person or thing that is named after something else. So the USS Kalidor would be Kalidor's namesake

@  Pennpenn : (22 July 2017 - 08:30 PM)

I thought it was either?

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (22 July 2017 - 08:27 PM)

It is very irritating that no one seems to agree on whether the word "namesake" refers to the thing that came first or the thing that came second.

@  2017 : (22 July 2017 - 07:19 PM)

I'd like it, but I really don't have the cash or the justification.

@  Paladin : (22 July 2017 - 02:48 PM)

Anyone still need a Chaos on Velocitron set? Found one at TRU today...

@  TheMightyMol... : (22 July 2017 - 01:27 PM)

He REALLY likes blowing stuff up.

@  Dekafox : (22 July 2017 - 12:42 PM)

G1 Scattershot's 3rd mode gimmick?

@  MEDdMI : (22 July 2017 - 12:04 PM)

Nothing can be more awkward than the crotch rubsigns.

@  Bass X0 : (22 July 2017 - 11:28 AM)

well, they had to go somewhere.

@  Pennpenn : (22 July 2017 - 02:54 AM)

TR Quake's shoulder symbols are very awkward looking

@  Kalidor : (21 July 2017 - 10:58 PM)

..er myself.

@  Kalidor : (21 July 2017 - 10:58 PM)

NOT RESPONDING

@  Kalidor : (21 July 2017 - 10:58 PM)

...

@  Kalidor : (21 July 2017 - 10:58 PM)

....

@  Kalidor : (21 July 2017 - 10:58 PM)

Couldn't say it bett.....

@  Steevy Maximus : (21 July 2017 - 10:33 PM)

You just don't appreciate the speed of a solid state drive until you have to use an old laptop with an old spinning drive

@  Patchouli Kn... : (21 July 2017 - 08:32 PM)

If there's at least one, you can army-build.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (21 July 2017 - 07:25 PM)

Are there even enough toys of him to collect?

@  TheMightyMol... : (21 July 2017 - 04:21 PM)

A nerd.

@  Nevermore : (21 July 2017 - 04:19 PM)

Speaking of, what do you call someone who collects toys of the Marvel character The Collector?

@  Nevermore : (21 July 2017 - 04:18 PM)

What about people who collect the "Die Hard" movies?

@  wonko the sane? : (21 July 2017 - 03:54 PM)

A lot of the die hard collectors don't need to be louder...

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (21 July 2017 - 03:22 PM)

@Nevermore Benbot means "amped" as in excited. I believe the term is shorthand for (a sound) amplifier.

@  Nevermore : (21 July 2017 - 03:10 PM)

Or is "shorthand" a synonym for "amputated"?

@  Nevermore : (21 July 2017 - 03:10 PM)

Is "amped" shorthand for "amputated"?

@  Benbot : (21 July 2017 - 12:28 PM)

I am amped! But I also have standards.

@  Fear or Courage : (21 July 2017 - 08:38 AM)

I consider Thew to basically be the model toy collector. We should all aim to be so amped about the thing we collect.

@  Pennpenn : (21 July 2017 - 07:21 AM)

And some people are just whiny jerks who like to complain about stuff and don't realise that, so will invent irrational grievances to fuel that need.

@  Rycochet : (21 July 2017 - 06:13 AM)

A lot of toy collectors don't seem to get that the things the collect are toys.and have unrealistic expectations of what's doable in a modern retail environment. You're not going to get a $100 figure's worth of parts and paint for $20 or less and gimmicks are needed tomake the toys actually, you know, fun.

@  Foffy : (20 July 2017 - 09:40 PM)

Not necessarily. With the right condiments, they can taste surprisingly nice.

@  Evac : (20 July 2017 - 09:37 PM)

I think most toy collectors are bitter in some form.

@  Diecast : (20 July 2017 - 09:37 PM)

...or maybe I'm the bitter one?!  Oh no.

@  Diecast : (20 July 2017 - 09:32 PM)

And I don't even mean that everyone should love it all. But it does seem to bring the angrier ones in from the lurking.

@  Diecast : (20 July 2017 - 09:29 PM)

It's these reveals that always remind me how exceptionally bitter a large portion of toy collectors are on other forums.

@  Sean Whitmore : (20 July 2017 - 07:06 PM)

SDCC toy reveals make adults happy by telling them what they can get eventually. Kids don't care what they can get eventually, you make them happy by getting them whatever's available now.

@  Jalaguy : (20 July 2017 - 06:10 PM)

They exist, they just don't show them at SDCC because they assume that the adult fanbase doesn't care about them.


- - - - -

Considering we get exclusive 2 packs 3 packs...


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
19 replies to this topic

#1 (Deactivated) Skullgrin2014

(Deactivated) Skullgrin2014
  • Guests

Posted 04 November 2011 - 08:26 AM

I was thinking about this just right now.


Considering we got weapon sets in energon and we get mech tech weapons with Dotm and hasbro tends to do exclusive 2-pack / 3-packs around movie time.


We also tend to get some sets that are like this for classics, TF Prime and WFC.


And, we've gotten sets with The TF prime kids, or a matrix with the Rodimus and Cyclonus set.


it got me to thinking. How come we don't get a set at that price that can come with an actual figure stand that could double as something. Like lets say an armory for people to peg accessories. 5 mm pegs etc.


Or even a stackable figure stand that could combine with other sets. To form a carrying case for things like Minicons or 5-mm weapons.



I just figure it would be neat. I always sort of wanted a detailed armory type thing that could come with some weapons sets.

Edited by MonsterFromMars, 04 November 2011 - 08:27 AM.


#2 Pyre

Pyre

    Atomic batteries to power, turbines to speed!

  • Citizen
  • 5158 posts

Posted 05 November 2011 - 11:02 PM

Why?

#3 Cat

Cat
  • Retired Staff
  • 11612 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 08:33 AM

There's some Gundam stands and weapons coming out that COULD possibly be crossed over. Don't know if it'd work, or how well, but it may be the closest there is for the moment.

#4 (Deactivated) Skullgrin2014

(Deactivated) Skullgrin2014
  • Guests

Posted 06 November 2011 - 10:45 AM

Why? It just makes sense that eventually you may as well have something you could use to optimize shelving displays, and places to put weapons and missiles. Which is lucrative enough to actually improve spacing and play of a collection.


It may as well be something designed with the actual toys in mind. I mean GiJoes get those peg stands. I'm surprised we never get painted floor stands with pegholes for TF's to stand on.




Plus I still love the concept of a Minicon prison/box. I mean they could sell individually packed minicons with both red and purple transformable containers. That can double as a stackable interconnectable shelving system and small little playset stands.


It it were designed right it wouldn't look stupid or clunky at all. It would actually be a great way to organize the figures. And which faction you prefer to keep them on.

Edited by MonsterFromMars, 06 November 2011 - 10:47 AM.


#5 Rust

Rust

    EXTRA THICK

  • Supporter
  • 41250 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 10:47 AM

Most TFs are designed to stand under their own power without stands.

Numbers 24:17

We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. Plato


#6 Esser-Z

Esser-Z

    I'm never going down at the hands of the likes of you

  • Citizen
  • 32940 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 10:49 AM

Yeah, uh, the 'why' is basically that very few people, especially in the primary audience, want that.

#7 (Deactivated) mignash

(Deactivated) mignash
  • Guests

Posted 06 November 2011 - 10:49 AM

It would help if Hasbro had the common sense to put a Joe sized hole in the feet of Transformers who needed it. They did that back during the Micromasters so they could stand on their bases.

#8 Luke

Luke
  • Retired Staff
  • 14897 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:10 AM

QUOTE(mignash @ Nov 6 2011, 12:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It would help if Hasbro had the common sense to put a Joe sized hole in the feet of Transformers who needed it.

*Looks at shelf upon shelf of free-standing Transformers*

Which ones are those?

Even assuming they did need them, the vast majority of Transformers don't have feet capable of accepting any sort of standardized hole. Often the foot itself has at least one point of transformation that prevents such a thing, or is hollow on the underside--more production cost on more plastic in places the figure doesn't actually need it.

QUOTE
They did that back during the Micromasters so they could stand on their bases.

Well, that's Micromasters. Action Masters had them too... but they also had bases/vehicles. Their reason for the feature was self-contained and doesn't apply across the board, what with a significant lack of playsets and vehicles.

#9 Destron D-69

Destron D-69

    @DestronD69

  • Supporter
  • 52763 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:14 AM

yeah, stands don't work and aren't really needed for the line. even titans of Backheavy like classics Megatron and BW Tigerhawk have feet DESIGNED to compensate for it...

and there's no way guys like generations wheeljack need stands
You must have Signatures turned on

#10 (Deactivated) Smitty

(Deactivated) Smitty
  • Guests

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:28 AM

QUOTE(mignash @ Nov 6 2011, 10:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It would help if Hasbro had the common sense to put a Joe sized hole in the feet of Transformers who needed it. They did that back during the Micromasters so they could stand on their bases.


QUOTE(Rust @ Nov 6 2011, 10:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Most TFs are designed to stand under their own power without stands.


#11 Esser-Z

Esser-Z

    I'm never going down at the hands of the likes of you

  • Citizen
  • 32940 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:31 AM

I don't own a single Transformer who can't stand under its own power. The closest things to exceptions are RotF Arcee, who DID come with a stand and has the excuse of a creative design, and my Transmetal Airrazor, who simply has developed really loose hips over the years.

#12 Destron D-69

Destron D-69

    @DestronD69

  • Supporter
  • 52763 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 12:25 PM

COURSE YOU TIGATRON!

okay okay sorry, pour taste

but yeah the whole "Giant robot" field in general lends itself to big feetitus since its a forced perspective aid


You must have Signatures turned on

#13 Spark

Spark
  • Citizen
  • 35266 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 04:44 PM

Unlike G. I. Joes, Transformers can stand on their own, even when the feet are tiny like Animated Blackarachnia... so there is zero point to having stands. They already tried that in a dumb way with Titaniums and I doubt most people ever took those out of the boxes.

Edited by Spark, 06 November 2011 - 04:46 PM.

Fall of Cybertron will blow your mind. That is all.

#14 Walky

Walky

    Sad Frogerson

  • Citizen
  • 36788 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 04:59 PM

Yeah, the only Transformers who tend to fall over do so because of weak joints at the ankle or above. And stands ain't gonna solve that worth jive.

#15 (Deactivated) Skullgrin2014

(Deactivated) Skullgrin2014
  • Guests

Posted 06 November 2011 - 07:21 PM

I realize the issue that most figures can stand on their own.

The implication was more of creating a display stand that gives them a good detailed background. With an enviroment that feels like it's interactive with the toys. And, maybe something that can double as a weapons storage.


Sort of like with Bw's you could have nature scenery or one of the tunnels within the Axalon or Pred ship. And have some containers for weapons. With 5mm peg holes so you can store guns.

I just mean it would be a cool way to store the weapons you might want to switch between. Without having to throw a jumble of guns on a dresser or what not.


Maybe I haven't refined the idea enough. And maybe I haven't thought it out well.


But, im kind of thinking of doing it myself with the gundam display stands. Like just drilling 5 mm peg holes or creating shelving. To just put guns on a rack. And have it double as a stand.


Also, with displays I find some of my toys fall even if they were designed to stand well. I gues I'm just thinking something through to make displaying easier and more play interactive. I don't know. But I kind of want the toys to have a world to interact with. Maybe thats something fans need to do on their own I suppose.


As for the Titanium stands. Thats not what I was thinking of. I was thinking of stands that look more like detailed scenery.

#16 Luke

Luke
  • Retired Staff
  • 14897 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 09:27 PM

You're talking display bases and scenes. We're getting those in some of the Cyberverse stuff, in the form of cardboard diorama backdrops. The (full-size) HAs and some other guys (like the NYCC set) have similar.

Because at the end of the day, that's all you're looking at: a diorama. Even if you put some additional stuff on it, it's a backdrop. They're already giving a good dose of what you're looking for, but those generally don't justify something more than cardboard no matter how you might spice them up.


#17 Spectre

Spectre
  • Retired Staff
  • 10545 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:01 PM

Even though we, as collectors, tend to keep our toys on the shelf 90% of the time, "place your toy here and don't move it" is not really part of the play-pattern Hasbro promotes.

#18 Destron D-69

Destron D-69

    @DestronD69

  • Supporter
  • 52763 posts

Posted 06 November 2011 - 11:12 PM

as is so often the case, we forget the kids are the main focus of the brand.


You must have Signatures turned on

#19 Zodberg

Zodberg

    The doctor is in.

  • Citizen
  • 15061 posts

Posted 08 November 2011 - 07:41 AM

it would be neat to see some more dynamic poses on shelves. Like I see with Gundam collectors. But I think it's better for everybody if fans just make their own stands rather than having them bundled with official toys. That would mean they're going to end up getting sold to a lot of people who don't want them.

And really, only a few Transformers are really articulated as the average Gundam model kit.
Woooo!

#20 TheMightyMollusk

TheMightyMollusk

    Not quite an angel, or the one that fell

  • Supporter
  • 37787 posts

Posted 08 November 2011 - 08:30 AM

If you really need stands, there are cheap doll stands available at craft stores that'll do the job. I'd rather the Transformers budgets go into the Transformers.