1) For the Star Wars Crossovers line, have there been any Star Wars vehicles that you've looked into producing as a Transformer, only to realize that there was no way to actually get it to convert? Whether it be too skinny, oddly shaped, or just altogether not enough surface area to hide a robot inside? We'd love to here the thought process on how the vehicles are chosen!
QUOTE(Hasbro)
We choose vehicles based on their iconic forms first, since we display them in vehicle mode in the packaging. So far, there hasn't been a problem with any of the vehicles that we?ve chosen for the line as the majority of Star Wars vehicles have enough mass to make the figure body work. There are numeous other vehicles that we haven't done, like Landspeeders and Speeder Bikes, that would pose some challenges but we haven't selected them because we didn't like how they would have presented themselves in vehicle mode in packaging - not enough "heft" to interest kids in them.
2) With all the Clone Wars Animated figures with limited articulation, why choose to take a step backward with the Clones themselves by removing articulation? While the "ab-crunch" articulation may not be quite as missed, the ankle articulation is a fundamental part of the clone body that allows for dynamism in posing and even for better stability in simple standing. The new Commander Stone now perches awkwardly next to his squad mates due to loss of this ankle articulation which, combined with even marginal package warping to the legs, seriously hampers stability.
QUOTE(Hasbro)
The large majority of Clone Wars figures are bought by kids, for whom, quite simply, super-articulation is a misplaced design. The actual cost of delivering this articulation is very large when it comes to molding, assembly, and deco. To keep costs down, and make sure that we are investing in the right areas for collectors (i.e. tooling for new movie figures, which is what far more fans are actively collecting), we needed to make the change.