Jump to content


Entertainment Earth


Toggle shoutbox Squawkbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

Please don't post Youtube videos in the chat box. The forums software auto embeds them. 

@  ▲ndrusi : (25 July 2016 - 08:35 PM)

beast wars dicketeth anniversary

@  Locoman : (25 July 2016 - 07:16 PM)

My story begins in nineteen-dickety-two. We had to say "dickety" because the Kaiser had stolen our word "twenty". I chased that rascal to get it back, but gave up after dickety-six miles.

@  Telly : (25 July 2016 - 05:21 PM)

its the rye of the kaiser its the thrill of the the fight

@  ▲ndrusi : (25 July 2016 - 05:18 PM)

Fierce Grape?

@  OrionPax44 : (25 July 2016 - 05:09 PM)

The Rye or the Kaiser.

@  tffan01 : (25 July 2016 - 04:55 PM)

watch?v=gyKOM3469_Y I've found this weird kids video.

@  OrionPax44 : (25 July 2016 - 04:20 PM)

Doozer Sticks

@  The Doctor Who : (25 July 2016 - 04:19 PM)

Fraggle Rock!

@  OrionPax44 : (25 July 2016 - 04:18 PM)

Happy Pop (nauseating just saying it)

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 July 2016 - 03:51 PM)

Hard Rock Hallelujah!

@  OrionPax44 : (25 July 2016 - 03:48 PM)

Soggy Rock

@  Dracula : (25 July 2016 - 02:36 PM)

Tank Concrete!

@  MEDdMI : (25 July 2016 - 02:16 PM)

the Third.

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 July 2016 - 02:16 PM)

Flint Chesthair!

@  OrionPax44 : (25 July 2016 - 02:12 PM)

Sheeps Butt Ramsbottom

@  MEDdMI : (25 July 2016 - 02:08 PM)

Fancypants

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 July 2016 - 02:01 PM)

Biggles.

@  Summer : (25 July 2016 - 01:55 PM)

Jones.

@  PlutoniumBoss : (25 July 2016 - 12:08 PM)

Osmosis.

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 July 2016 - 11:09 AM)

Mayhem is, somewhat ironically, one of the least random parts of the board. I really don't know how that happened.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (25 July 2016 - 06:34 AM)

Not even close.

@  MEDdMI : (25 July 2016 - 05:51 AM)

What, Mayhem isn't random enough???

@  NotVeryKnightly : (25 July 2016 - 04:02 AM)

This place never feels random enough in that respect.

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 July 2016 - 02:10 AM)

I thought that was snarking at random strangers without fear of retribution.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 July 2016 - 07:22 PM)

Topic-specific threads are the main feature of messageboards like this, you know.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 July 2016 - 07:21 PM)

You should ask that in the TFWiki thread.

@  tffan01 : (24 July 2016 - 07:21 PM)

watch?v=94l4qCKMYZ0  

@  tffan01 : (24 July 2016 - 07:18 PM)

there's a pewdiepie video promoting Transformers Earth Wars and it is an official promotion video, does this mean he should get a tfwiki page?

@  ▲ndrusi : (24 July 2016 - 07:01 PM)

I thought King Kong '05 was pretty great! I just wish I hadn't watched it as a double feature with that movie about the island with the giant bugs.

@  tffan01 : (24 July 2016 - 04:46 PM)

yeah it was long as hell, it took me several days to finish it.

@  Paladin : (24 July 2016 - 11:58 AM)

maybe this new one won't take half a day to watch all the way through...

@  tffan01 : (24 July 2016 - 11:00 AM)

I believe this new Kong movie will not be as good as the 2005 one.

@  Pennpenn : (24 July 2016 - 08:52 AM)

You'd figure something like that would get a pass, some kind of grandfather clause since the name is already intractably established.

@  Paladin : (24 July 2016 - 08:15 AM)

"DS-1 Orbital Battle Station." That's the official classification...

@  Bass X0 : (24 July 2016 - 08:04 AM)

now that Hasbro can't use the word "Death" on the packaging of their toys, what will they call the Death Star?

@  Whirl Maximus : (24 July 2016 - 07:44 AM)

It's in the comic con trailer and seems like a hideous waste. I guess the show makers have no reverence for Doctor Who like they do Star Trek.

@  Bass X0 : (24 July 2016 - 04:20 AM)

Which is the height of quality for Family Guy jokes...

@  Whirl Maximus : (24 July 2016 - 04:00 AM)

David Tennent has done a cutaway for Family Guy. Don't get to excited it was a fart joke.

@  Broadside : (23 July 2016 - 03:17 PM)

"Micronauts: Starring psychic Peter Quill and E123-Omega".

@  Broadside : (23 July 2016 - 03:16 PM)

Ooh, sounds neat.

@  Sockie : (23 July 2016 - 01:16 PM)

Yeah, the first was definitely the weakest of the three. Really looking forward to the next issue; judging by the preview for it, it's delving into Karza and Shazraella's past and Microspace's exact political situation.

@  Broadside : (23 July 2016 - 01:11 PM)

I was ambivalent about the first issue, but the quality stepped up in the second and again in the third.

@  Sockie : (23 July 2016 - 10:37 AM)

And yes, Micronauts is great! I enjoyed the first three issues quite a lot.

@  Sockie : (23 July 2016 - 10:36 AM)

Cave Carson looks really cool as well, so I can't be too saddened about that.

@  Broadside : (23 July 2016 - 06:29 AM)

I ended up checking it out, and it's pretty damn neat.

@  Broadside : (23 July 2016 - 06:28 AM)

So. Micronauts, huh?

@  Maruten : (23 July 2016 - 03:49 AM)

Oh, it's only backups in "Cave Carson Has A Cybernetic Eye". Still. Onboard.

@  Maruten : (23 July 2016 - 03:44 AM)

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

@  Maruten : (23 July 2016 - 03:43 AM)

I didn't think I was interested but OH DEAR GOD WONDER TWINS yesssssssss

@  Sockie : (22 July 2016 - 08:29 PM)

http://www.comicbookresources.com/imgsrv/imglib/0/0/1/superpowers-b18fd.jpg


Photo
- - - - -

Different types of G1 collector


29 replies to this topic

#1 Maz

Maz

    Square One

  • Citizen
  • 842 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:15 PM

Hey guys,

Here's my piece on the different types of vintage Transformers collector I've come across since joining the hobby. Some great collection pictures contributed that are worth the jump alone icon-hotrod.gif

Variant Collectors or Collector Variants? | TF Source News <- CLICK TO READ



Huge thanks to Mijo, Jon Krause, Matteo Pigliucci, Ras, Arkvander, Morgan Evans, Colin Pringle, Heroic Decepticon and Ben Munn.

All the best
Maz

#2 tec

tec

    Seriously fun

  • Supporter
  • 23403 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TADED
  • Faction::Lesbian Ninja

Posted 23 February 2012 - 09:12 PM

Wow the prototype collector is fascinating

Im the budget collector
Loose and complet as possable with the least amout of money possable
Things this type of collector cannot get include
Japanese Exclusives (Overlord,Star Saber) and MISB

Wait. Wait, wait, wait. Are you telling me that tec has a job? I thought his sole reasons for existence are cheesecake and horrible grammar.-Shadowman024

sigtest1D_zpsa793aca9.jpg


#3 CORVUS

CORVUS

    Can you hear the thunder thatís breaking?

  • Supporter
  • 30620 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA
  • Faction::Autobot

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:04 PM

I collect the things I like. Simple.

Transformers is a brand that really has something for everyone. We are a darn lucky fandom.

 

card_grandmaximus.jpg


#4 Magnusblitz

Magnusblitz
  • Citizen
  • 3615 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:06 PM

QUOTE(^0^CORVUS^o^ @ Feb 23 2012, 07:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I collect the things I like. Simple.


I think that describes everyone except TJ Omega, who also makes it a point to collect things he hates so he can make funny reviews about 'em.

#5 The Doctor Who

The Doctor Who

    Cross Man With a Screwdriver and a Box

  • Supporter
  • 8668 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Indiana, United States
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 23 February 2012 - 10:19 PM

I guess I'd be a nostalgia G1 collector? Though I don't really collect G1 figures... mostly because they're either incredibly expensive... or broken.

Hm... in a more broad sense, I collect based on three simple rules:

1 - It's an awesome figure.

2 - It's a character I like.

3 - It's an awesome figure of a character I like.

3 is the ideal situation :D

Neat article in any case.

Edited by The Doctor Who, 23 February 2012 - 10:19 PM.

nzo8WYb.png


#6 Robowang

Robowang

    Predacon Oyster

  • Supporter
  • 2275 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Your fantasies
  • Faction::Predacon

Posted 24 February 2012 - 11:13 AM

I collect based on complete series. I don't feel the need to have every series, but for series I collect, I want all the figures from it. I don't usually do variations within the series, though, and I'm certainly a loose/complete collector. I do have a few figures I display in boxes for variety of display, but they just happened to come with the box when I bought them.

I have completed RID, Armada, Energon, Cybertron, and Classics; I'm one figure away from completing Universe (U1 and U2 together), four figures away from completing Robot Masters, five figures away from completing Machine Wars, five figures away from completing U.S. G1, 13 figures from EU G1, and something like 15 away from completing U.S/EU G2.

I do have a smattering of Beast Era toys, but there are so few of those I do like that I just don't feel the need to go completist on them.

Edited by Robowang, 24 February 2012 - 11:14 AM.


#7 Galenraff

Galenraff

    Sarcasm: unappreciated.

  • Administrator
  • 33204 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Central Illinois
  • Faction::Maximal

Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:22 PM

That's a fascinating look at the cross-section of collecting. Nice work!

It also makes me feel even better about backing off collecting (even full lines) and just getting the stuff I actually want, instead of feeling that there's ever anything out there I "need."

card-pm-optimus.jpg


#8 Sciflyer

Sciflyer

    Tomorrow's Harvest

  • Citizen
  • 2878 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida
  • Faction::Autobot

Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:42 PM

QUOTE(Galenraff @ Feb 24 2012, 12:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's a fascinating look at the cross-section of collecting. Nice work!

It also makes me feel even better about backing off collecting (even full lines) and just getting the stuff I actually want, instead of feeling that there's ever anything out there I "need."


Indeed. Early on, I considered myself a completist within certain boundaries - namely the 1984 - 1987 years. After finishing that quest, I collected just the Beast-era toys that were onscreen in the show. From the end of that era through today, I've only collected the toys that I absolutely love. I have found that this is more enjoyable for the exact reason you've described - that there is nothing that I feel like I "need" anymore. Plus with the dawn of the 3rd party companies, I feel that I can afford to throw more money at something that might be unique , without worrying that it is eating into funds that would otherwise be designated for completist purposes.

#9 NotVeryKnightly

NotVeryKnightly
  • Citizen
  • 10657 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:somewhere
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 February 2012 - 12:45 PM

QUOTE(Magnusblitz @ Feb 24 2012, 10:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE(^0^CORVUS^o^ @ Feb 23 2012, 07:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I collect the things I like. Simple.


I think that describes everyone except TJ Omega, who also makes it a point to collect things he hates so he can make funny reviews about 'em.

I think in some of his videos, he's actually mentioned how he doesn't hat them that much. He's said at some point that he's not planning to sell any of the things he's portrayed as so horrible. It's just that he has very strong opinions on what makes a good toy, and tries to make them entertaining.

I forgot that spaghetti was a pasta really.


#10 Axaday

Axaday
  • Supporter
  • 33419 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Heartland of America

Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:06 AM

I'm kinda complicated, but I have sometimes wondered if I care more about mini spies than anyone else in the world.

#11 Boltax

Boltax

    Pap Pap! Kue Ray Yong Pap!

  • Citizen
  • 2952 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:30 AM

That article was awful. I went in expecting for it to describe the different kinds of people in the fandom, and the different orientations they have. Instead it was like reading an old Optimus Prime variants list. It didn't tell me anything. The distinction between a "Mint in package" collector and a "Mint in package Japanese collector" just... really doesn't interest me in the slightest. This wasn't an article about collectors. It was an article about toys.

Another thing that annoyed me was the value judgements. The condemnation towards people who collect multiples of a single toy, for example, really betrayed the writer's own biases, in a negative way.

It's really unfortunate, because it's an intriguing premise. There ARE different kinds of toy collectors -- and certainly there's different MOTIVATIONS in collecting. Do you get into it for the toys? For the fiction? This article just didn't deliver any sort of insight.

--Andrew S.
(I also thought the article was really badly organised -- some sub-headings and more paragraph breaks would have made reading it a lot easier/more enjoyable. It also would have made it easier to see at a glance that the article wasn't going to live up to expectations.)

Edited by Boltax, 25 February 2012 - 09:32 AM.


#12 Might Gaine

Might Gaine

    ARMS UP!! \(^_^)/

  • Retired Staff
  • 12894 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:35 AM

Fun read icon-hotrod.gif How about the lucky draw collector? Seems like that's not as popular anymore, but TF@TM have a killer collection of them...

Sign up at ToyStoreUpdates.com to get email updates when new Transformers come into stock at Toys R Us, Target, Walmart, and Hasbro Toy Shop.


#13 Might Gaine

Might Gaine

    ARMS UP!! \(^_^)/

  • Retired Staff
  • 12894 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:37 AM

QUOTE(Boltax @ Feb 25 2012, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That article was awful. I went in expecting for it to describe the different kinds of people in the fandom, and the different orientations they have. Instead it was like reading an old Optimus Prime variants list. It didn't tell me anything. The distinction between a "Mint in package" collector and a "Mint in package Japanese collector" just... really doesn't interest me in the slightest. This wasn't an article about collectors. It was an article about toys.

Another thing that annoyed me was the value judgements. The condemnation towards people who collect multiples of a single toy, for example, really betrayed the writer's own biases, in a negative way.

It's really unfortunate, because it's an intriguing premise. There ARE different kinds of toy collectors -- and certainly there's different MOTIVATIONS in collecting. Do you get into it for the toys? For the fiction? This article just didn't deliver any sort of insight.

--Andrew S.
(I also thought the article was really badly organised -- some sub-headings and more paragraph breaks would have made reading it a lot easier/more enjoyable. It also would have made it easier to see at a glance that the article wasn't going to live up to expectations.)

Man, you crap all over everything. Write your own article.

Sign up at ToyStoreUpdates.com to get email updates when new Transformers come into stock at Toys R Us, Target, Walmart, and Hasbro Toy Shop.


#14 tec

tec

    Seriously fun

  • Supporter
  • 23403 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:TADED
  • Faction::Lesbian Ninja

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:20 AM

The multiple version of one toy one I can see as being negitive...
And I can see why some might not like it....At the same time though..

I myself own 3 lose Jetfires two where bought in the same lot though (for less then a hundred) and one was the Robotech variant

So maybe theres a story there we are not seeing

Wait. Wait, wait, wait. Are you telling me that tec has a job? I thought his sole reasons for existence are cheesecake and horrible grammar.-Shadowman024

sigtest1D_zpsa793aca9.jpg


#15 CatSCAN

CatSCAN
  • Supporter
  • 3996 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Plano, TX
  • Faction::RIBFIR

Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:53 AM

Great article. And you're right, awesome pictures. There really is something about seeing all the MB packages or the AFA graded '84 cars all in one place. It's a special kind of gorgeous. icon-hotrod.gif

#16 LV!

LV!

    Ol' 55

  • Citizen
  • 8160 posts
  • Location:OH

Posted 25 February 2012 - 12:33 PM

I'm not going to come down on it as hard as Boltax, but I thought the written part of this article was pretty useless. The pictures are neat - I particularly liked the shot of the MB Autobot cars - but I didn't learn anything about those kinds of collection or about what makes people amass them. And the paragraph about single-toy collectors was so absurdly hostile and dismissive that I almost feel like it must have been an injoke from Maz to someone he knows (the Jetfire owner, maybe?) - but without being "in" on that, you're simply left with the face value of someone who starts off extolling the virtues of AFA grading declaring that buying lots of the same toy is the "damaging" action of a "hoarder".

To say nothing of how many types of collector, as brought up in this very thread, are nothing like any of these "types". The whole thing just comes off as very myopic and colored heavily by the kind of collecting Maz likes. It might be understandable, but it doesn't make for appealing reading, and it's a pretty weak framework to hang a bunch of really nice collection photos on.

EDIT: I should probably throw in how insanely jealous Maz's Mirage collection there makes me.

Edited by LV!, 25 February 2012 - 01:05 PM.


#17 M-A-K

M-A-K
  • Citizen
  • 423 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Faction::Autobot

Posted 25 February 2012 - 01:21 PM

I'll add to this (nice topic).

Im a person who likes to collect whole series. I had the whole Classics through RTS series until I sold them to help my mother. Since its expensive collecting backwards I'm now trying to get All the Prime toys. If I ever get a second job I'll try to collect my CHUG again. Lol, at least I have photos of my beloved collection.

#18 Maz

Maz

    Square One

  • Citizen
  • 842 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:06 PM

QUOTE(Boltax @ Feb 25 2012, 09:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That article was awful. I went in expecting for it to describe the different kinds of people in the fandom, and the different orientations they have. Instead it was like reading an old Optimus Prime variants list. It didn't tell me anything. The distinction between a "Mint in package" collector and a "Mint in package Japanese collector" just... really doesn't interest me in the slightest. This wasn't an article about collectors. It was an article about toys.

Another thing that annoyed me was the value judgements. The condemnation towards people who collect multiples of a single toy, for example, really betrayed the writer's own biases, in a negative way.

It's really unfortunate, because it's an intriguing premise. There ARE different kinds of toy collectors -- and certainly there's different MOTIVATIONS in collecting. Do you get into it for the toys? For the fiction? This article just didn't deliver any sort of insight.

--Andrew S.
(I also thought the article was really badly organised -- some sub-headings and more paragraph breaks would have made reading it a lot easier/more enjoyable. It also would have made it easier to see at a glance that the article wasn't going to live up to expectations.)


Thanks for your feedback on this one, I do generally get positive feedback but usually my replies at the Allspark are few and far between to the point where I wondered if people were even reading them here. Negative feedback has been rare so it's actually refreshing to see it, and I'm the first to admit that I could do with some comments to improve my work. It's one of the reasons I started writing for TFSource actually, Curt wanted a very different type of weekly look at things to what I was used to writing for TF-1; super in-depth toy variation and history articles that go on for 10,000 words!

I have to apologise if the article actually sold something different than what it advertised, and I apologise for making excuses for it but this one is the one I have spent the least time on since I started writing for Source a year and a half ago, having a pregnant wife in hospital and bashing an article out between allowed visiting hours clearly doesn't agree with the educated TF audience icon-fire.gif Having said that, I did read it over when I had a chance and I was actually pleased with it. So no excuses really, let me see if I can address some of yours and LV's points:

- I should probably have made it more clear it was more about collecting habits/niches/directions than the people themselves. My statements in the opening post I hoped would make it clear what I was going for, just a summary of the types of collecting/collector I've come across since joining the hobby online. And of course as I am strictly G1/pre-G1 focused these days (with a serious weakness for Binaltechs, Alternators, Movie and Animated), it's quite a tunnel view of my little corner of interest. Curt has pretty much asked for me to be a voice on the things that make up the G1 and pre-G1 era, I think he's got other guys far more clued up on current product for the other end of the spectrum. Maybe had that been clearer, you'd have known earlier the article wouldn't have appealed to you directly, so I apologise for the time wasted on reading it, there's nothing worse than falsely advertised journalism, programming, news etc

- In my defence regarding hoarders, I have accepted that collectors can collect multiples of certain items out of love and nothing else. I've done it before, I had a few G1 Scourges on display as Sweeps etc. Some of my friends collect 2 or 3 of each toy to display in each mode, to re-create the look of old toy catalogues. I think that's beautiful actually. What I was referring too, and it isn't clear enough I guess, is that some collectors buy every example of a certain item that comes up for sale in order to hoard them and corner the market, in an attempt to monopolise and drive up the price for future investment. There's been a great deal of this going on in the Diaclone collecting circle recently and it's harmed the community a little bit. Again, that's my tunnel view of that corner of the world, I just felt like bringing some awareness to that prevalent issue. I apologise for offending anyone who felt their love of a certain figure and a collection of multiple specimens was being attacked.

- Funny you should mention the sub-headings. I actually never use them, and I haven't for any Source Article so far, but Curt has mentioned to me a few days ago he thought this one would benefit from such sub-headings. You are clearly both onto something there, so at the first opportunity I believe he will edit that accordingly.

Thanks again for your feedback icon-hotrod.gif

QUOTE(Might Gaine @ Feb 25 2012, 09:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Fun read icon-hotrod.gif How about the lucky draw collector? Seems like that's not as popular anymore, but TF@TM have a killer collection of them...


Ah, I didn't get the chance to highlight this area of collecting in enough detail, it was restricted to a few words at the end. A token mention, really. I would have loved to expand this article over 2 weeks and really go into some depth (may have avoided the above mistakes) but I had enough photos for 1 week and certainly not enough material for 2.


QUOTE(LV! @ Feb 25 2012, 12:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm not going to come down on it as hard as Boltax, but I thought the written part of this article was pretty useless. The pictures are neat - I particularly liked the shot of the MB Autobot cars - but I didn't learn anything about those kinds of collection or about what makes people amass them. And the paragraph about single-toy collectors was so absurdly hostile and dismissive that I almost feel like it must have been an injoke from Maz to someone he knows (the Jetfire owner, maybe?) - but without being "in" on that, you're simply left with the face value of someone who starts off extolling the virtues of AFA grading declaring that buying lots of the same toy is the "damaging" action of a "hoarder".

To say nothing of how many types of collector, as brought up in this very thread, are nothing like any of these "types". The whole thing just comes off as very myopic and colored heavily by the kind of collecting Maz likes. It might be understandable, but it doesn't make for appealing reading, and it's a pretty weak framework to hang a bunch of really nice collection photos on.

EDIT: I should probably throw in how insanely jealous Maz's Mirage collection there makes me.


Haha thank you, but if it makes you feel any better I have since sold many of those Mirages including the Robot Masters and the G2 Mirage hand-painted mock-up prototype icon-screamer.gif

I'm really glad you liked the pictures, it was partially aimed as a tribute to the amazing work some of those guys have put into presenting us with such beautiful collections, and more importantly, references. For example, Mijo and Ben may have/had incredible collections to be immensely proud of, but the info and help they have provided in establishing connections between toylines and variations with their work and their collecting just shows it's not all about amassing items. It's good that they can receive due credit for their achievements.

There was some in-joke sentiment in the hoarder paragraph, and to make it clear that was aimed at buyers who buy the *exact* same figure/variation repeatedly for the purposes outlined in the article. They are few and far between but those that have the access and power to do it in the "right" niche can cause a lot of damage and really affect the other enthusiasts and their collecting. I did believe that a lot of my friends and fellow Diaclone enthusiasts would cotton onto exactly what I was referring to there but I didn't intend for it to exclude those who weren't in on it. It wasn't clear enough though, as the feedback clearly suggests.

About not including enough info about the toys themselves within the photos, I feel that I have covered that adequately in the previous 24 articles I have written for Source, especially the European TF stuff and Diaclone stuff, also the pre-production series which clearly outlined the motivation behind buying those kinds of toys. I can clearly see the article would benefit from links to those articles in the appropriate paragraphs. I also felt I did put in some words about why people would collect such items, and I must also say that I am one of the most anti-grading collectors out there. I don't call it AFA-degrading for nothing ;)

Thanks again for your feedback, you can be certain I'll keep it in mind during future articles.

All the best
Maz

Edited by Maz, 25 February 2012 - 05:10 PM.


#19 Spark

Spark
  • Citizen
  • 32417 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:34 PM

Is there such a thing as an "obscurist" collector that goes after things unknown or forgotten by others? Because I think that's what I follow, aside from the usual "I buy what I like" category.
Fall of Cybertron will blow your mind. That is all.

#20 Thylacine 2000

Thylacine 2000

    Charismatic Megafauna

  • Citizen
  • 14833 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 25 February 2012 - 05:35 PM


I was a completist from mid-BW through early Armada. So, the most worthless junk space-wasters imaginable.

At this point, I'm mostly at "the 7 or 8 characters I'm absolutely in love with and will buy all variants and merchandise forever," plus "the last few boxed vintage figures that I don't think I could ever bring myself to sell." And sometimes the vintage-ness works against the figure, because after literally decades of them always standing there looking the same, you really do start to think "how long am I gonna keep a Diaclone-era mold in a cardboard box when I have bills to pay?"



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users