Jump to content


Entertainment Earth


Toggle shoutbox Squawkbox Open the Shoutbox in a popup

Please don't post Youtube videos in the chat box. The forums software auto embeds them. 

@  OrionPax44 : (25 August 2016 - 04:50 PM)

Is the main dance move him flashing you in beat with the music?

@  Broadside : (25 August 2016 - 04:50 PM)

http://i.imgur.com/qeoJpsf.jpg

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 August 2016 - 04:48 PM)

HEEEEEEEEEEY FOODSTAMP LAAADAAAY

@  Broadside : (25 August 2016 - 04:45 PM)

Oppa Homeless Style?

@  LV! : (25 August 2016 - 01:01 PM)

That guy had a perfectly nice home, he just didn't want the neighbors to see you with him.

@  TheMightyMol... : (25 August 2016 - 11:52 AM)

Did you at least buy him dinner?

@  Robowang : (25 August 2016 - 11:14 AM)

So I was making out with this random old homeless guy, and he stops and is all like "Why are you making out with me?" and I'm just like "Shut up, Homeless Guy."

@  Benbot : (25 August 2016 - 07:34 AM)

What?

@  MEDdMI : (25 August 2016 - 05:58 AM)

Aren't we the ones causing trouble for Kalidor?

@  LBD "Nyt... : (25 August 2016 - 12:17 AM)

Also, anyone know how to find the rest of how Kalidor got a kid in trouuuuuubleee?

@  LBD "Nyt... : (25 August 2016 - 12:11 AM)

@ TheMightyMol... : (24 August 2016 - 03:20 AM) Why do you hate yourself? -- I don't, really. Whether good or ill, I'd like to know how RG1 goes so, if nothing else, I can actually talk about it from a place of experience.

@  Verity Carlo : (24 August 2016 - 06:58 PM)

I've seen Minority Report, I don't want to read the same thing except with superheroes and also shit

@  Verity Carlo : (24 August 2016 - 06:57 PM)

You know, what I hate about Civil War II the most is that it's not even trying to break out of the Minority Report shaped hole it's in.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 02:39 PM)

the debate sems to be over.

@  MEDdMI : (24 August 2016 - 02:37 PM)

Wouldn't it be easier to debate this in the comics subforum?

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 01:31 PM)

I don't have anything else to say (although I still think G2 is the true ending, even if G I Joe doesn't mention it, it seems G I Joe/G2 crossover isn't canon for G I Joe comics but only for the Transformers continuity)

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 01:29 PM)

ok whatever you won.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 01:27 PM)

that's why I said "if", I dunno I didn't read G2 or G I Joe. 

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 01:26 PM)

Also,you're still basing this entirely on G2 matching a storyline that was part of G2 itself rather than whether or not G2 matches better with the G1 comic proper.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 01:24 PM)

The idea kind of falls apart when it requires that the apocalyptic alien invasions had such little impact that everyone easily just ignored forever.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 01:17 PM)

If some issues of G I Joe comics is a prelude to G2 and if there's nothing in the future G I Joe stories that condradicts San Francisco getting destroyed, yes I would say they share a continuity. 

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 01:02 PM)

If you're gonna go "we can assume it did happen even though it's never talked about as long as nothing specifically contradicts it", then surely it's just as easy to assume that the actual G1 TF and Joe crossover happened in the backstory of Classics and RG1.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 01:02 PM)

also I refrained from mentioning Ask Vector Prime but but didn't it say RG1 is a splinter timeline?

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:58 PM)

has san francisco ever appeared in G I Joe stories that was chronologically set after G2?

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:55 PM)

Intent is not the same as result. And comics end up ignoring things quite often.

@  Telly : (24 August 2016 - 12:54 PM)

maybe they figured a lot of people that read gi joe also read transformers. so they throw a crossover/build up in their to get some excitement for the new comic coming

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:51 PM)

If G2 universe was to be unrelated to G I Joe, why did they do a prelude to it?

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:33 PM)

Classics and RG1 not including Joe issues 138-145 in their backstory does not preclude them from including TF 1-80, or even the Joe and TF miniseries.

@  TheMightyMol... : (24 August 2016 - 12:30 PM)

Marvel 616 is also a massive continuity snarl from dozens of writers altering, retconning, or ignoring each others' work for decades, so it's not really a great example for an argument on continuity.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:29 PM)

Marvel 616 continuity is a shared universe, devastating events happens in individual series but does mean every event gets mentioned in other comics? @Notvery knightly, yeah that's why I edited that post.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:27 PM)

Your proof for "TF universe = Joe universe" itself is the G2 lead-up, so your reasoning still goes back to G2 matching G2.

@  TheMightyMol... : (24 August 2016 - 12:25 PM)

So did GI Joe ever reference the time Bludgeon sent his entire force to rampage across the Earth? Or the time Jhiaxus blew San Francisco into a crater?

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:25 PM)

whatever.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:22 PM)

Are you not seeing the recursiveness of "G2 is the true G1 sequel because G2 follows up on a G2 storyline"?

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:18 PM)

Yeah it has been established that Marvel Transformers and G I Joe comics takes place in the same universe. Unless 90s G I Joe was a reboot I'm pretty sure the G2 crossing over to a G I Joe comic that takes place in the very same universe as the original Transformers makes G2 the canon ending.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:16 PM)

A crossover that the Joe comic apparently ignored.

@  Arazyr : (24 August 2016 - 12:15 PM)

They had a crossover before that, 1986. http://tfwiki.net/wi...he_Transformers

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:15 PM)

Did G.I. Joe acknowledge the planet getting wrecked by the Swarm? Because otherwise it's more like "Marvel Transformers is the same universe as Marvel G.I. Joe only when they feel like it".

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 12:11 PM)

You're using the G.I. Joe G2 prequel itself as the basis for "Marvel Transformers universe is the same universe as the Marvel G I Joe", which makes this a rather loopy argument.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 12:07 PM)

As I said before, Marvel Transformers universe is the same universe as the Marvel G I Joe. Marvel G I Joe crossovers with G2, which makes G2 the canon ending. 

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 11:59 AM)

How is that relevant to whether or not RG1 (or Classics, even) takes place after issues 1 through 80 of Marvel TF proper?

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 11:51 AM)

it's a prequel to G2, which makes it the same universe as G2.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 11:48 AM)

That's clearly not in G2 itself, seeing as it's G.I. Joe issue 138.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 11:45 AM)

@NotVrtyKnightly Im talking about these issues. http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Unfoldings!

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (24 August 2016 - 11:30 AM)

Now for my part, I consider Marvel G2/Alignment the "true" ending because of Simon Furman's involvement in it, its continuous narrative with Marvel G1, and its sequential publication.

@  SHIELD Agent 47 : (24 August 2016 - 11:28 AM)

The nature of multiple spinoffs/branching timelines means that to call any one spinoff the "true" ending is an arbitrary decision.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 11:16 AM)

Joe doesn't take place "in G2". Even their Marvel TF-related history isn't confined entirely to a single publication from the 90s.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 11:08 AM)

Look, oirignal Marvel Transformers takes place in the same universe as G I Joe and G I Joe takes place in the same universe as G2, which makes G2 the true canon ending.

@  NotVeryKnightly : (24 August 2016 - 11:07 AM)

And it's not like anyone would argue that Rebirth wasn't actually the fourth season of the Sunbow cartoon entirely based on the lack of Ramirez and Old Snake.

@  tffan01 : (24 August 2016 - 11:07 AM)

No you don't get it, I'm not saying RG1 is "less true" because G I Joe doesn't show up.


Photo

Swear filter addendum request


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
31 replies to this topic

#1 Corgsopal

Corgsopal

    Hanging 'round amorphous mounds

  • Supporter
  • 5736 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fixin' ta Boo Boo.
  • Faction::Lesbian Ninja

Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:14 PM

Imaget right to it. Can we add Bayformers to the swear filter?
Reclaim the suffix.

#2 Wing

Wing

    Puns will continue until morale improves.

  • Supporter
  • 17935 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Call center hell.
  • Faction::Cannonball's Pirate Crew

Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:15 PM

I second this idea wholeheartedly.

#3 Esser-Z

Esser-Z

    I'm never going down at the hands of the likes of you

  • Citizen
  • 32940 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Findlay, OH.
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:15 PM

Thirded with all my might.

#4 Shadewing

Shadewing

    Evil faces a Black Night

  • Supporter
  • 30797 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Nowhere.
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 22 January 2012 - 08:24 PM

I fully support this suggestion.

3DS Friend Code: 0387-9040-3532

 

Twitch Channel

 

Youtube Replays

 

VOTE for what I play on 8/30!

 

Friday: Sonic Generations - Sunday: Transformers WFC - Tuesday: Little Inferno


#5 MrBlud

MrBlud

    Goes down smooth...

  • Staff
  • 49762 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Westlake, OH
  • Faction::RIBFIR

Posted 22 January 2012 - 09:52 PM

And what would we have the filter change it to?

tease-sig.jpg


#6 Darkstream

Darkstream

    The original darkstream since 2003!

  • Supporter
  • 20494 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Aka K.I.R.A.
  • Faction::Minicon

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:02 PM

uh ok...sounds dum...

#7 CORVUS

CORVUS

    Can you hear the thunder thatís breaking?

  • Supporter
  • 30620 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA
  • Faction::Autobot

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:06 PM

I suppose it could be swapped out with "Movie-formers"?

Transformers is a brand that really has something for everyone. We are a darn lucky fandom.

 

card_grandmaximus.jpg


#8 DeadPigmon

DeadPigmon
  • Supporter
  • 12338 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:10 PM

Movie-Style maybe? it depends on the context I guess

#9 Wing

Wing

    Puns will continue until morale improves.

  • Supporter
  • 17935 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Call center hell.
  • Faction::Cannonball's Pirate Crew

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:10 PM

QUOTE(MrBlud @ Jan 22 2012, 08:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And what would we have the filter change it to?

"Transformers that appeared in the series of films directed by Michael Bay and its various supplemental materials".

Edited by Wingus, 22 January 2012 - 10:11 PM.


#10 Kalidor

Kalidor

    Freedom is the Right of All Synthetic Beings

  • Owner
  • 58511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Faction::Cannonball's Pirate Crew

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:20 PM

I'm gonna have to thumbs down this one I think.

I can see where you're coming from but it's a pretty widespread term and it seems silly to just outright censor it. The only time we've ever really done that was for Titaniums because people kept calling them Tits and I put Hasblow in there because that's just vulgar... but Bayformers is a pretty readily identifiable term to refer to movie styled Transformers and is on the same level as GeeWun to me.

card-mindwipe.jpg


#11 Corgsopal

Corgsopal

    Hanging 'round amorphous mounds

  • Supporter
  • 5736 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fixin' ta Boo Boo.
  • Faction::Lesbian Ninja

Posted 22 January 2012 - 10:22 PM

Movieverse or Movie style or something like that.

Edit: sorry, Kal. Didn't see you'd made a ruling before I posted this reply.

Edited by Corgsopal, 22 January 2012 - 10:46 PM.

Reclaim the suffix.

#12 Esser-Z

Esser-Z

    I'm never going down at the hands of the likes of you

  • Citizen
  • 32940 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Findlay, OH.
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 23 January 2012 - 08:54 PM

Darnit.

#13 Touch My Thighs

Touch My Thighs

    Always do the opposite of what TMT says

  • Citizen
  • 37842 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Freezing Tropics

Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:04 PM

Let's filter "." to ", Verily."

01110010 01101111 01110011 01100101 01100010 01110101 01100100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01100001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110011 01101100


#14 ExVee

ExVee
  • Supporter
  • 8873 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 23 January 2012 - 11:12 PM

...if the swear filter is made to block a word and the selected replacement contains that word (nevermind why you'd do that, just go with the question) would it cause some kind of universe-consuming (or at least software breaking) recursion loop?

#15 Jeremy

Jeremy

    Gargo 220 or something

  • Retired Staff
  • 23660 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Columbus, IN
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:27 AM

Can't really agree with this, because it feels like people calling for censoring something just because it has potentially negative connotations due to being commonly used alongside opinions they don't like. The term itself isn't vulgar or negative in of itself, and could be used by people who don't mind the movie styling. Really sounds like overregulation.
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise." - Cato the Elder

"Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper." - Larry Flynt

#16 Shadewing

Shadewing

    Evil faces a Black Night

  • Supporter
  • 30797 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Nowhere.
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:47 AM

QUOTE(Jeremy @ Jan 24 2012, 11:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can't really agree with this, because it feels like people calling for censoring something just because it has potentially negative connotations due to being commonly used alongside opinions they don't like. The term itself isn't vulgar or negative in of itself, and could be used by people who don't mind the movie styling. Really sounds like overregulation.


So what about the out cry against I A W T P?

People got tired of seeing it, and it got swear filtered, yet its not vulgar or negative.

3DS Friend Code: 0387-9040-3532

 

Twitch Channel

 

Youtube Replays

 

VOTE for what I play on 8/30!

 

Friday: Sonic Generations - Sunday: Transformers WFC - Tuesday: Little Inferno


#17 Kalidor

Kalidor

    Freedom is the Right of All Synthetic Beings

  • Owner
  • 58511 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Faction::Cannonball's Pirate Crew

Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:04 PM

Quit bypassing the swear filter.








Heh.

card-mindwipe.jpg


#18 Jeremy

Jeremy

    Gargo 220 or something

  • Retired Staff
  • 23660 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Columbus, IN
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:06 PM

I think that one was more about post whoring, people merely saying they agreed without adding anything to the thread. Ask anyone who knows me better than the average board member, a lot of things annoy me. I just don't think an overregulated board is necessarily a better board.
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise." - Cato the Elder

"Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper." - Larry Flynt

#19 Shadewing

Shadewing

    Evil faces a Black Night

  • Supporter
  • 30797 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Nowhere.
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:41 PM

QUOTE(Jeremy @ Jan 24 2012, 12:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think that one was more about post whoring, people merely saying they agreed without adding anything to the thread. Ask anyone who knows me better than the average board member, a lot of things annoy me. I just don't think an overregulated board is necessarily a better board.


So, like the first several posts in this thread which are all "I agree" and nothing more? Should there be a rule stating you can't agree with something unless you write a whole essay on why, so they adding to the thread?

3DS Friend Code: 0387-9040-3532

 

Twitch Channel

 

Youtube Replays

 

VOTE for what I play on 8/30!

 

Friday: Sonic Generations - Sunday: Transformers WFC - Tuesday: Little Inferno


#20 Jeremy

Jeremy

    Gargo 220 or something

  • Retired Staff
  • 23660 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Columbus, IN
  • Faction::Free Agent

Posted 24 January 2012 - 12:43 PM

I would help you fill your nitpicky arguing quota for January, but I really don't feel like it. Already said my piece. icon-hotrod.gif
"Wise men profit more from fools than fools from wise men; for the wise men shun the mistakes of fools, but fools do not imitate the successes of the wise." - Cato the Elder

"Majority rule only works if you're also considering individual rights. Because you can't have five wolves and one sheep voting on what to have for supper." - Larry Flynt




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users